Marroquin v. Ashron Construction & Restoration, Inc et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 for Filing of Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/7/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014)

*E-Filed: March 7, 2014*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555
HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196
PHUNG TRUONG, Bar No. 287687
JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP
84 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 790
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN
and VINCENT DE LA TORRE
Dawna J. Cilluffo [231219]
Chelsea K. Dunton [288742]
DC Law, Dawna J. Cilluffo, A Professional Corp.
2005 De La Cruz Blvd., Suite 215
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14

Attorneys for Defendants
ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC.,
EZRA COHEN and U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20

CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and
VINCENT DE LA TORRE,

21
22
23
24

Case No. 13-CV-00421 (HRL)

Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.
ASHRON CONSTRUCTION &
RESTORATION, INC.; EZRA COHEN;
and U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,

25
Defendants.
26
27

Plaintiffs CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and VINCENT DE LA TORRE and

28

Defendants ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC.; EZRA COHEN; and U.S.
1

Case No. 13-CV-00421 (HRL)

STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as
follows:
1.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants met and conferred regarding potential

amendments and revisions to the Complaint in order to facilitate settlement proceedings;
2.

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Plaintiff may file a Second Amended

Complaint, which removes some factual allegations only, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
3.

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants waive notice and service of the

Second Amended Complaint and shall not be required to answer the amendment.
4.

WHERAS, the parties agree that this amendment will not necessitate any

modifications of deadlines already set by the Court.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties jointly request that the Court grant leave to the Plaintiffs to
file the proposed Second Amended Complaint.

14
15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case No. 13-CV-00421 (HRL)

STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Dated: February 26, 2014

2

//s// Phung H. Truong
Tomas E. Margain
Huy Tran
Phung H. Truong
JUSTICE AT WORK LAW GROUP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and
VINCENT DE LA TORRE

3
4
5
6

Dated: February 26, 2014

7
//s// Chelsea K. Dunton
Dawna J. Cilluffo
Chelsea K. Dunton
DC LAW
Attorneys for Defendants
ASHRON CONSTRUCTION &
RESTORATION, INC., EZRA COHEN and
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Case No. 13-CV-00421 (HRL)

STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2
3
4
5

ORDER
Based on GOOD CAUSE shown, leave to file the Second Amended Complaint attached as
Exhibit A to the stipulation is hereby granted. Defendants do not need to file an Answer as the
Answer on file is deemed the responsive pleading. This amendment shall also not modify any
deadlines already set by this Court.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

DATED:

March 7, 2014

By:

10

HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

Case No. 13-CV-00421 (HRL)

STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT