Henning v. Chirco

Filing 25

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SEALING MOTION. Accordingly, on or before May 21, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a motion to seal both (1) the proposed settlement agreement and (2) the agreement signed by the parties subsequent to the November medi ation. Plaintiff is advised that the motion to seal must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) and must contain all of the attachments required by that rule. In light of this order and considering the lack of written opposition to the enforcement motion, the hearing scheduled for May 23, 2014, is VACATED and will be reset by the court if necessary. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/16/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2014)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN JOSE DIVISION

5

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-00443 EJD

RICHARD C. HENNING,

6

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE SEALING MOTION

Plaintiff(s),
7
8

v.
DOMINIC CHIRCO, et. al.,

9
Defendant(s).
/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Currently pending in the above-entitled action is Plaintiff’s motion to enforce a settlement

12

agreement, which, according to Plaintiff’s counsel, contains a confidentiality clause. See Docket

13

Item Nos. 21, 22. For this reason, Plaintiff did not attach to the motion either his proposed

14

settlement agreement or the agreement signed by the parties subsequent to the mediation on

15

November 18, 2013.

16

However, the court must review these documents in order to properly consider Plaintiff’s

17

enforcement motion and wishes to do so before any hearing on that issue. Accordingly, on or before

18

May 21, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a motion to seal both (1) the proposed settlement agreement and

19

(2) the agreement signed by the parties subsequent to the November mediation. Plaintiff is advised

20

that the motion to seal must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) and must contain all of the

21

attachments required by that rule.

22

In light of this order and considering the lack of written opposition to the enforcement

23

motion, the hearing scheduled for May 23, 2014, is VACATED and will be reset by the court if

24

necessary.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: May 16, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

27
28
1
Case No. 5:13-cv-00443 EJD
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SEALING MOTION