Hannah v. //
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/22/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE DAVE H. HANNAH,
No. C 13-00665 EJD (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On February 14, 2013, Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed a letter with the
Court, which initiated these proceedings. (Docket No. 1.) On March 7, 2013, Plaintiff
filed a letter indicating that he had no intention on filing a civil suit. (Docket No. 4.)
Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss his complaint with or without order of this Court.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A), (a)(2). Because no opposing party has been served,
Plaintiff’s letter requesting to dismiss these proceedings is construed as a “notice of
dismissal,” and requires no order from the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(I).
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate all
pending motions and deadlines and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
Order of Dismissal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE DAVE H. HANNAH,
Case Number CV 13-00665 EJD (PR)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on ______________________________, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the
person(s)hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said
copy(ies) inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Dave H. Hannah
Correctional Training Facility
P. O. Box 689
Soledad, Ca 93960
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?