Gonzales v. City Of San Jose et al

Filing 241

ORDER RE 232 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/18/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MARY LOU GONZALES, Case No. 13-cv-00695-BLF Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES 9 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., [Re: ECF 232] Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintiff is requested to provide the Court with a summary of hours expended on the major 14 tasks necessary to prosecute this action as set forth on the chart below. The Court expects that the 15 total number of hours will equal the hours set forth in the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and as 16 reflected in the time sheets submitted in support of the Motion. The information requested will 17 provide the Court with a clear understanding of the Lodestar amount requested by Plaintiff and 18 assist the Court in assessing the reasonableness of the hours expended. 19 20 Task 21 Pre-Suit Investigation 22 Drafting Initial Complaint 23 Motion to Dismiss 24 Drafting Amended Complaints 25 Discovery, including motions 26 Case Management Conferences 27 and Filings 28 Motion for Summary Judgment Kallis Berki Gagliasso Emmaneel Acquesta Staff 1 Settlement Discussions and 2 Briefs 3 Trial Preparation 4 Miscellaneous (describe) 5 Total Hours 6 7 In addition to the above recitation, Plaintiff shall provide the Court with calculations of the 8 following categories of hours expended. The Court recognizes that these hours were included in 9 the above-listed categories. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Task 12 Monell Claim 13 Ms. Acquesta’s Case Orientation 14 Battery Claim Time Devoted 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 20 Dated: April 18, 2016 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?