Gonzales v. City Of San Jose et al
Filing
246
ORDER REQUIRING UPDATE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
MARY LOU GONZALES,
Case No. 13-cv-00695-BLF
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER REQUIRING UPDATE
9
10
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
[Re: ECF 225]
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On February 11, 2016, the Court granted the parties’ Stipulation Re: Resolution of Case,
14
which provided that Defendants would pay Plaintiff within 21 calendar days of the Court’s order
15
on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees and that, upon receipt of payment, Plaintiff would
16
dismiss the action with prejudice. ECF 225. On May 26, 2016, the Court issued its Order Granting
17
as Modified Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. ECF 244. Defendants’ deadline for payment was
18
therefore June 16, 2016 and Plaintiff’s notice of dismissal should have followed shortly thereafter.
19
Instead, more than a month has passed. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to dismiss the
20
case or provide a status update regarding resolution by no later than July 26, 2016.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 19, 2016
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
