Gonzales v. City Of San Jose et al

Filing 248

ORDER GRANTING 247 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

M.JEFFREY KALLIS, ESQ. (SBN: 190028)
Law Firm of Kallis and Associates, P.C.
333 W.San Carlos Street, 6th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
Telephone Number: [phone]
Facsimile Number: [phone]
E-Mail Address: [e-mail]
Steven Michael Berki, Esq. (SBN: 245426)
BUSTAMANTE & GAGLIASSO, APC
333 W. San Carlos Street, 6th Floor
San Jose, CA 95110
Telephone Number: [phone]
Facsimile Number: [phone]
E-Mail Address: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff MARY LOU GONZALES

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (88625)
NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (93249)
ARDELL JOHNSON, Chief Deputy City Attorney (152833)
Office of the City Attorney
200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor
San José, California 95113-1905
Telephone Number: [phone]
Facsimile Number: [phone]
E-Mail Address: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE,
YVONNE DELACRUZ, MATTHEW ARCHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MARY LOU GONZALES
v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff,

SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case No.

CV13-0695 BLF

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Fed. R. Civ. P. §41(a)(1)(A)

Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Mary Lou Gonzales (“Plaintiff”)

and defendants City of San Jose, Matthew Archer, and Yvonne De La Cruz (“Defendants”) that
Page 1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

in response to the resolution obtained and after having met and conferred, Plaintiff’s
Complaint and each cause of action should be dismissed with prejudice.
The parties thereby agree as follows:

Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice. All claims and parties are dismissed by

way of this Stipulation. This Stipulation and Dismissal is brought pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 21, 2016

BUSTAMANTE & GAGLIASSO, P.C.

Dated: July 21, 2016

KALLIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Dated: July 21, 2016

By:________________/S/__________________
Steven M. Berki, Counsel of Record
for Plaintiff
By:__________________/S/________________
M. Jeffery Kallis, Counsel of Record
for Plaintiff
RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney

19
20
21
22

By:___________/S/____________
Ardell Johnson
Chief Deputy City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants

23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the stipulation is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 21, 2016

________________________________
Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
United States District Judge