Reyes v. Meyer
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ABEL REYES,
C 13-980 RMW
12
13
v.
14
15
A. MEYER,
16
Plaintiff, [] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR AN ELEVEN-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT’S SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Defendant.
17
18
Defendant Meyer has brought a motion for an eleven-day extension of time to file a reply
19
brief in support of Defendant’s summary-judgment motion. Having reviewed the motion papers
20
submitted in support and opposition, and good cause appearing, Defendant’s motion is
21
GRANTED. Defendant Meyer shall file a reply brief on or before January 7, 2014.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
Dated: ___________________________
__________________________
The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
27
28
1
[] Order Granting Def.’s Mot. for an Eleven-Day Ext. to File a Reply Brief (C 13-980 RMW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ABEL REYES,
Case Number: CV13-00980 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
A MEYER et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on February 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Abel Reyes P-55763
3B05-134 Low
CA State Prison-Corcoran
4001 King Avenue
Post Office Box 3466
Corcoran, CA 93212-3466
Dated: February 3, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?