Schmidt v. Coldwell Banker Residential et al

Filing 68

ORDER RE: 67 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF. Any opposition to the motion shall be filed and served on or before 7/9/2013. Any reply shall be filed and served on or before 7/16/2013 at which time the matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/27/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:13-cv-00986 EJD RODERIC MALCOLM SCHMIDT, 11 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE, et. al., [Docket Item No(s). 67] 14 15 Defendant(s). / 16 17 On June 25, 2013, Plaintiff Roderic Malcolm Schmidt filed a Motion to Extend Fact 18 Discovery Cutoff. See Docket Item No. 67. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any opposition to the 19 motion shall be filed and served on or before July 9, 2013. Any reply shall be filed and served on or 20 before July 16, 2013, at which time the matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral 21 argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: June 27, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:13-cv-00986 EJD ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?