Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. Simon Property Group, Inc. et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 Stipulated Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal filed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/23/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2013)

Download PDF
*E-Filed: October 23, 2013* 2 3 4 5 LAW OFFICES OF DAWN CEIZLER DAWN CEIZLER, Bar No. 214873 1990 N. California Blvd., Suite 305 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 932-8225 Facsimile: (925) 226-4849 Attorney for Plaintiff Pacific Gas and Electric Company 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California Company Plaintiff. vs. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV13-1043-HRL STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 15 16 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, this Stipulated Settlement Agreement is entered into by and 17 between Plaintiff Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E") and Defendant Simon Property 18 Group, Inc. ("Simon"). 19 WHEREAS, on January 28, 2013 PG&E filed a complaint in the Superior Court of 20 California, Contra Costa County which was removed by Simon to this Court on March 7, 2013 21 alleging damage to certain PG&E property due to a leak in a water line at The Great Mall in 22 Milpitas, California on or about October 3, 2010 (the "Complaint"). 23 WHEREAS, PG&E and Simon, through their authorized representatives and without any 24 admission or fmal adjudication of the issues of fact or law with respect to PG&E' s claims, have 25 reached a settlement that they consider to be a just, fair, adequate, and equitable resolution of the 26 disputes set forth in the Complaint. 27 28 - 1STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL CV13-1043-HRL NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS 2 3 FOLLOWS: 1. Simon shall pay PG&E a sum certain as full satisfaction of any and all claims alleged in 4 the Complaint as set forth more fully in a Settlement Agreement prepared and executed by the 5 parties. 6 7 2. In exchange for the payment described above, PG&E will dismiss all of its claims contained in the Complaint against Simon. 8 3. In the event of an action to enforce any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, 9 the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorneys' fees, 10 11 12 13 court costs and necessary disbursements incurred in connection with such action. 4. PG&E has asserted no personal injury claims in the Complaint and there is no need to notify Medicare or any other lienholder of the settlement reached between the parties. 5. Upon approval of this agreement by the Court, all counts of PG&E' s Complaint shall be 14 dismissed with prejudice. The parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court 15 retain jurisdiction to oversee compliance with the terms of this Agreement and to resolve any 16 motions to modify such terms. 17 18 19 Dated: October /5, 2013 amuel S. Baxter, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Simon Property Group, Inc. 20 21 Dated: October tS , 2013 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 2STIPULATED SETTLEtvffiNT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSALCV13-1043-HRL 1 2 3 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are 4 DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move 5 to reopen the case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 35 6 days of this order. All scheduled dates, including the trial and pretrial dates, are VACATED. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED 8 9 Dated: October_, 20 13 23 Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATED SETILEMENT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL CV13-1043-HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?