GSI Technology, Inc. v. United Memories, Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 27, 2013. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KORULA T. CHERIAN (SBN 133967)
[e-mail]
CONSTANCE RAMOS (SBN 203637)
[e-mail]
SARAH M. JALALI (SBN 244971)
[e-mail]
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED MEMORIES, INC.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

JEFFREY M. SHOHET (SBN 067529)
[e-mail]
CHRISTOPHER J .BEAL (SBN 216579)
[e-mail]
VERONICA L. JACKSON (SBN 243095)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, California 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Cal. Bar No. 234756)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 5:13-CV-01081

\\080450/000139 - 1049175 v2

1

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN JOSE DIVISION

4
5

GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,

6

Plaintiff,
v.

7

Case No. 5:13-cv-01081-PSG
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT

8
9

UNITED MEMORIES, INC., a Colorado
Corporation,

10

Defendant.
Whereas, defendant, United Memories, Inc.(“UMI”) has requested additional time to

11
12

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action; and

13

Whereas, plaintiff, GSI Technology (“GSI Tech”) is willing to accommodate UMI’s

14

request provided that the delay in UMI’s response to the Complaint will not alter or prejudice in

15

any way GSI Tech’s claim for preliminary relief as set forth in its Ex Parte Application for

16

Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause Regarding Preliminary Injunction, and

17

Expedited Discovery in the Alternative.

18

Therefore, Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff GSI Technology, Inc. and

19

Defendant United Memories, Inc., by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and

20

agree that Defendant United Memories, Inc. may have an extension of time, up to and including

21

May 1, 2013, in which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned

22

action.

23

The parties further stipulate that this extension of time will not prejudice the rights and

24

remedies to which GSI Tech may be entitled and will not alter the date of any event or any

25

deadline already fixed by the Court, including, without limitation, the hearing on Plaintiff GSI

26

Technology, Inc.’s Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Order to Show Cause

27

Regarding Preliminary Injunction, and Expedited Discovery in the Alternative, which is set for

28

March 28, 2013.
STIP. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 5:13-CV-01081

\\080450/000139 - 1049175 v2

2

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 27, 2013

3

Respectfully submitted,
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

4
By: /s/ Korula T. Cherian_________________
Korula T. Cherian

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED MEMORIES, INC.

7
8
9

Dated: March 27, 2013

10

DLA PIPER LLP (US)
By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Shohet____________________
Jeffrey M. Shohet

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.

12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

_________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIP. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 5:13-CV-01081

\\080450/000139 - 1049175 v2

3