GSI Technology, Inc. v. United Memories, Inc.

Filing 458

ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 451 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13

GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

14
Plaintiff,
15
16

v.
UNITED MEMORIES, INC., et al.,

17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 5:13-cv-1081-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL
(Re: Docket No. 451)

Before the court is Defendant United Memories, Inc.’s administrative motion to file under
seal exhibit A to the Declaration of Constance F. Ramos, filed in support of UMI’s opposition
letter brief to GSI’s motion for sanctions. Consistent with Civil L. R. 79-5, the motion is DENIED

22
without prejudice for the following reasons:
23
24
25
26

1. The sealing request is not narrowly-tailored to confidential technical and business
information.
2. The portions to be sealed are not highlighted in the unredacted submission.

27
28
1
Case No.: 5:13-cv-1081-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL

1

3. The proposed order does not list in table format each narrowly-tailored portion sought to be

2

sealed.

3

The requesting party is free to resubmit an error-free administrative motion to file under

4
5
6

seal no later than April 29, 2015.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 24, 2015

7
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:13-cv-1081-PSG
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SEAL