Arruda v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER RELATING CASES (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 HUMBERTO ARRUDA, Plaintiff, v. LUCKY STORES, INC. aka SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 13-CV-01155-LHK ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER RELATING CASES On July 22, 2013, Arruda and Lucky Stores filed a stipulation in which they state that they 18 are in agreement that: (1) Arruda may file his proposed First Amended Complaint, and (2) the 19 instant matter should be related to Arruda v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Case 20 No. 13-CV-1192. ECF No. 16 at 2. The parties state that United Food agrees to the relation as 21 well. Id. The Court therefore ORDERS: (1) Arruda shall file his First Amended Complaint by 22 July 24, 2013; (2) Defendants shall have thirty (30) days to respond to the FAC after it is filed; and 23 (3) this action shall be related to Case No. 13-CV-1192 because “[t]he actions concern 24 substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event. . . .” Northern District of California 25 Local Rule 3-12. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: July 22, 2013 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 28 1 Case No.: 13-cv-01155-LHK ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER RELATING CASES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?