Arruda v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
Filing
17
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER RELATING CASES (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
HUMBERTO ARRUDA,
Plaintiff,
v.
LUCKY STORES, INC. aka SAVE MART
SUPERMARKETS, a California corporation;
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 13-CV-01155-LHK
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT; ORDER RELATING
CASES
On July 22, 2013, Arruda and Lucky Stores filed a stipulation in which they state that they
18
are in agreement that: (1) Arruda may file his proposed First Amended Complaint, and (2) the
19
instant matter should be related to Arruda v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Case
20
No. 13-CV-1192. ECF No. 16 at 2. The parties state that United Food agrees to the relation as
21
well. Id. The Court therefore ORDERS: (1) Arruda shall file his First Amended Complaint by
22
July 24, 2013; (2) Defendants shall have thirty (30) days to respond to the FAC after it is filed; and
23
(3) this action shall be related to Case No. 13-CV-1192 because “[t]he actions concern
24
substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event. . . .” Northern District of California
25
Local Rule 3-12.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: July 22, 2013
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
1
Case No.: 13-cv-01155-LHK
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER RELATING CASES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?