LPL Financial, LLC et al v. Briley et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER 15 for filing of Second Amended Complaint filed by LPL Financial, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/8/13. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2013)

*E-Filed: October 8, 2013*

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

David S. Markun (SBN 108067)
Daria Dub Carlson (SBN 150628)
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP
17383 Sunset Boulevard, Suite A380
Pacific Palisades, California 90272
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (31 0) 454-5970
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
EdwardS. Zusman (SBN 154366)
Oriet Cohen-Supple (SBN 206781)
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP
465 California Street, 51h Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Jon R. Giffen (SBN 142158)
KENNEDY ARCHER & HARRA Y
24591 Silver Cloud Ct. #200
Monterey, California 93940
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs LPL Financial, LLC and
William Hastie

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE

19
20

LPL FINANCIAL, LLC, a California
limited liability company; and
WILLIAM HASTIE, an individual,

21
22

Plaintiffs,

v.

ICase No. C-13 1207 HRL
STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

MIKE T. BRILEY, et al.,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective
27
attorneys of record that Plaintiffs LPL FINANCIAL, LLC and WILLIAM HASTIE ("Plaintiffs")
28
STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

may file a Second Amended Complaint reflecting Plaintiffs' dismissal of the cause of action for

2

violation ofFederal computer fraud law (18 U.S.C. §1030(a), and that all other allegations and

3

causes of action remain unchanged. A copy of the Second Amended Complaint is attached hereto

4

as Exhibit A to this Stipulation.

5

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the defendants waive notice and service ofthe

6

Second Amended Complaint, and shall not be required to answer the amendment, and that all

7

denials, responses and affirmative defenses contained in the Answer filed by the defendants to the

8

First Amended Complaint shall be responsive to the Second Amended Complaint.

9

10
Dated: 9/20/2013

11

DAVIDS. MARKUN
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP

12
13

Counsel for Plaintiffs

14

15
Dated: 9/20/2013

16
17

Counsel for Defendants

18
19
20

21

ORDER

22

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS

23

ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file the Second Amended Complaint within fifteen y (7) days

24

of this order.

25
26

October

8
Dated: September _ _, 2013
HON. HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

27
28
2

STJPlJLA TION FOR FlUNG OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT