LPL Financial, LLC et al v. Briley et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation with Proposed Order to Remand filed by William Hastie, LPL Financial, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/16/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)
*E-Filed: October 16, 2013*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
David S. Markun (SBN 108067)
Daria Dub Carlson (SBN 150628)
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP
17383 Sunset Boulevard, Suite A380
Pacific Palisades, California 90272
Telephone: (31 0) 454-5900
Facsimile: (31 0) 454-5970
Email: dmarkun@mzclaw.corn
Email: dcarlson@mzclaw.corn
EdwardS. Zusrnan (SBN 154366)
Oriet Cohen-Supple (SBN 206781)
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP
465 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 438-4515
Facsimile: (415) 434-4505
Email: ezusman@mzclaw.com
Email: ocohen@mzclaw.com
14
Jon R. Giffen (SBN 142158)
KENNEDY ARCHER & HARRA Y
24591 Silver Cloud Ct. #200
Monterey, California 93940
Telephone: (831) 373-7500
Facsimile: (831) 3 73-7555
Email: jgiffen@kahlaw.net
15
Attorneys for Plaintfffs LPL Financial, LLC and
12
13
William Hastie
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
19
20
21
LPL FINANCIAL, LLC, a California
limited liability company; and
WILLIAM HASTIE, an individual,
22
Plaintiffs,
I
Cage No.
c~ 13
1207 HRL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER TO
REMAND REMOVED ACTION
v.
23
MIKE T. BRILEY, et al.,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiffs LPL Financial, LLC, and
28
William Hastie ("Plaintiffs") on one hand, and defendants Michael T. Briley, Steve Shearn, F.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED I ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACl'ION- CASE NO. C-13 1207 HRL
Warren Wayland, Hayashi & Wayland Accounting and Consulting, LLP, Hayashi & Wayland
2
3
4
Retirement Plan Services, Hayashi & Wayland Administrative and Insurance Services, Inc.,
Hayashi & Wayland Investment Services, LLC, and Leigh Jeter ("Defendants") on the other
hand, (collectively "Parties"), through their respective attorneys of record as follows :
5
STIPULATION
6
7
8
1.
the State of California in and for the County of Monterey entitled LPL Financial, LLC, and
William Hastie vs. Mike Briley, et al., case number M 121336 (the "Action").
9
2.
14
4.
§ 1030(a).
5.
19
6.
Complaint that omitted Plaintiffs' claim for computer fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a) ("SAC").
7.
8.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT:
25
27
On October 8, 2013, Plaintiffs filed the SAC with this Court, which omitted the 18
U.S.C. § 1030(a) claim and, in turn, the basis for this Court's jurisdiction over the Action.
24
26
On October 8, 2013 honorable magistrate judge Howard R. Lloyd entered an
Order permitting Plaintiffs to file the SAC.
22
23
On September 23, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order with
this Court pursuant to which the Defendants stipulated that Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended
20
21
On March 21, 2013, the Defendants completed the removal process by filing a
conformed copy of the Notice of Removal with Monterey County Superior Court.
17
18
On March 19,2013, the Defendants filed a Notice ofRemoval ofthe Action to this
Court, pursuant to U .S.C. § 1441 (b) based on Plaintiffs' claim of computer fraud under 18 U .S.C.
15
16
On or about January 30,2013, the Defendants accepted service ofthe First
Amended Complaint, to which the Defendants filed an Answer on March 15, 2013.
12
13
On January 11, 2013, the Defendants accepted service of the Complaint.
3.
10
11
On December 31, 2012, Plaintiffs commenced an action in the Superior Court of
9.
The Action should immediately be remanded to the Monterey County Superior
10.
Each Party shall bear his/her/its/their own attorneys' fees and costs with respect to
Court.
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION- CASE NO. C-13 1207 HRL
1
the removal and subsequent remand of the Action pursuant to this stipulation.
2
11.
3
This Stipulation moots all pending deadlines, and hearings in this case should be
taken off the Court's calendar.
4
12.
5
This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission or statement that the
Action was improperly removed to federal court.
6
7
Dated: 10/3/2013
8
c ,1w Lt-v----
~ J. ___
DAVIDS. MARKUN
MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP
9
Counsel for Plaintiffs
10
11
Dated: 10/3/2013
12
13
14
Counsel for Defendants
15
16
17
18
19
')()
"-V
'
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND !PROPOSED) ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED A<..'TION- CASE NO. C-131207 HRL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ORDER
THE COURT, HAVING REVIEWED THE STIPULATION AND HAVING
DETERMINED THAT GOOD CAUSE EXISTS, ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
The Parties' Stipulation is approved;
2.
Northern District of California case number C-13 1207 HRL; titled LPL
FINANCIAL LLC AND WILLIAM HASTIE V. MIKE T. BRILEY, et al.; is hereby remanded to the
Superior Court of California, County ofMonterey.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
13
Dated: October_, 2013
16
HON. HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPUI..ATION AND !PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION- CASE NO. C-131207 HRL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?