LPL Financial, LLC et al v. Briley et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation with Proposed Order to Remand filed by William Hastie, LPL Financial, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/16/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

Download PDF
*E-Filed: October 16, 2013* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 David S. Markun (SBN 108067) Daria Dub Carlson (SBN 150628) MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP 17383 Sunset Boulevard, Suite A380 Pacific Palisades, California 90272 Telephone: (31 0) 454-5900 Facsimile: (31 0) 454-5970 Email: dmarkun@mzclaw.corn Email: dcarlson@mzclaw.corn EdwardS. Zusrnan (SBN 154366) Oriet Cohen-Supple (SBN 206781) MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP 465 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 438-4515 Facsimile: (415) 434-4505 Email: ezusman@mzclaw.com Email: ocohen@mzclaw.com 14 Jon R. Giffen (SBN 142158) KENNEDY ARCHER & HARRA Y 24591 Silver Cloud Ct. #200 Monterey, California 93940 Telephone: (831) 373-7500 Facsimile: (831) 3 73-7555 Email: jgiffen@kahlaw.net 15 Attorneys for Plaintfffs LPL Financial, LLC and 12 13 William Hastie 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE 19 20 21 LPL FINANCIAL, LLC, a California limited liability company; and WILLIAM HASTIE, an individual, 22 Plaintiffs, I Cage No. c~ 13 1207 HRL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION v. 23 MIKE T. BRILEY, et al., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiffs LPL Financial, LLC, and 28 William Hastie ("Plaintiffs") on one hand, and defendants Michael T. Briley, Steve Shearn, F. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED I ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACl'ION- CASE NO. C-13 1207 HRL Warren Wayland, Hayashi & Wayland Accounting and Consulting, LLP, Hayashi & Wayland 2 3 4 Retirement Plan Services, Hayashi & Wayland Administrative and Insurance Services, Inc., Hayashi & Wayland Investment Services, LLC, and Leigh Jeter ("Defendants") on the other hand, (collectively "Parties"), through their respective attorneys of record as follows : 5 STIPULATION 6 7 8 1. the State of California in and for the County of Monterey entitled LPL Financial, LLC, and William Hastie vs. Mike Briley, et al., case number M 121336 (the "Action"). 9 2. 14 4. § 1030(a). 5. 19 6. Complaint that omitted Plaintiffs' claim for computer fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a) ("SAC"). 7. 8. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT: 25 27 On October 8, 2013, Plaintiffs filed the SAC with this Court, which omitted the 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a) claim and, in turn, the basis for this Court's jurisdiction over the Action. 24 26 On October 8, 2013 honorable magistrate judge Howard R. Lloyd entered an Order permitting Plaintiffs to file the SAC. 22 23 On September 23, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order with this Court pursuant to which the Defendants stipulated that Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended 20 21 On March 21, 2013, the Defendants completed the removal process by filing a conformed copy of the Notice of Removal with Monterey County Superior Court. 17 18 On March 19,2013, the Defendants filed a Notice ofRemoval ofthe Action to this Court, pursuant to U .S.C. § 1441 (b) based on Plaintiffs' claim of computer fraud under 18 U .S.C. 15 16 On or about January 30,2013, the Defendants accepted service ofthe First Amended Complaint, to which the Defendants filed an Answer on March 15, 2013. 12 13 On January 11, 2013, the Defendants accepted service of the Complaint. 3. 10 11 On December 31, 2012, Plaintiffs commenced an action in the Superior Court of 9. The Action should immediately be remanded to the Monterey County Superior 10. Each Party shall bear his/her/its/their own attorneys' fees and costs with respect to Court. 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION- CASE NO. C-13 1207 HRL 1 the removal and subsequent remand of the Action pursuant to this stipulation. 2 11. 3 This Stipulation moots all pending deadlines, and hearings in this case should be taken off the Court's calendar. 4 12. 5 This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission or statement that the Action was improperly removed to federal court. 6 7 Dated: 10/3/2013 8 c ,1w Lt-v---- ~ J. ___ DAVIDS. MARKUN MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP 9 Counsel for Plaintiffs 10 11 Dated: 10/3/2013 12 13 14 Counsel for Defendants 15 16 17 18 19 ')() "-V ' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND !PROPOSED) ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED A<..'TION- CASE NO. C-131207 HRL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER THE COURT, HAVING REVIEWED THE STIPULATION AND HAVING DETERMINED THAT GOOD CAUSE EXISTS, ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is approved; 2. Northern District of California case number C-13 1207 HRL; titled LPL FINANCIAL LLC AND WILLIAM HASTIE V. MIKE T. BRILEY, et al.; is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, County ofMonterey. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: October_, 2013 16 HON. HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPUI..ATION AND !PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION- CASE NO. C-131207 HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?