UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Schaefer
Filing
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Motions terminated: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/27/2013 at 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 8/6/2013. 8 MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA terminated as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on June 24, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
*E-FILED: June 24, 2013
1
2
3
4
5
NOT FOR CITATION
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
11
No. C13-01233 HRL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
STEVEN W. SCHAEFER,
12
13
Respondent.
____________________________________/
14
15
16
17
18
19
Good cause having been shown by the petitioner upon the petition filed in the aboveentitled proceeding on March 19, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Respondent Steven W. Schaefer shall appear before this court on August 27, 2013
at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 2, Fifth Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street,
San Jose, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why respondent should not be
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required by the Internal Revenue
Summons served upon respondent as alleged and set forth in the petition.
2.
Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of
the petition, upon respondent in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
at least thirty-five (35) days before the return date of this order specified above.
1
2
3
3.
On or before August 6, 2013, respondent may file and serve a written response to
the petition, supported by appropriate affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 1746, as well as any motion respondent desires to make.
4
4.
On or before August 13, 2013, petitioners may file and serve a written reply to such
5
6
response, if any.
7
5.
All motions and issues raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date
8
of this order, and only those issues raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive
9
pleadings and supported by affidavit(s) or declaration(s) will be considered at the return of this
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
order. Any uncontested allegation in the pleading will be considered admitted.
11
12
6.
The parties are reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a
13
magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. Accordingly, the parties shall, no later than
14
August 20, 2013, file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2)
15
a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States
16
District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and declination forms are available at the
17
18
19
20
Clerk’s Office and may also be obtained from the court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
7.
The Initial Case Management Conference, initially set for July 2, 2013, is vacated.
Dated: June 24, 2013
21
22
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
C13-01233 HRL Order will be electronically mailed to:
2
Michael G. Pitman michael.pitman@usdoj.gov
3
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
4
5
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?