UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Schaefer

Filing 8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/27/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom No. 2, Fifth Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, CA. Show Cause Response due by 8/6/2013. Motion terminated: 7 MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA terminated as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on June 25, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)

*E-FILED: June 25, 2013*

1
2
3
4
5

NOT FOR CITATION

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
v.
11

No. C13-01234 HRL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS

LINDA I. SCHAEFER,
12
13

Respondent.
____________________________________/

14
15
16
17
18
19

Good cause having been shown by the petitioner upon the petition filed in the aboveentitled proceeding on March 19, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.

Respondent Linda I. Schaefer shall appear before this court on August 27, 2013 at

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 2, Fifth Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street,
San Jose, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why respondent should not be

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required by the Internal Revenue
Summons served upon respondent as alleged and set forth in the petition.
2.

Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of

the petition, upon respondent in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
at least thirty-five (35) days before the return date of this order specified above.

1
2
3

3.

On or before August 6, 2013, respondent may file and serve a written response to

the petition, supported by appropriate affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 1746, as well as any motion respondent desires to make.

4
4.

On or before August 13, 2013, petitioners may file and serve a written reply to such

5
6

response, if any.

7

5.

All motions and issues raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date

8

of this order, and only those issues raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive

9

pleadings and supported by affidavit(s) or declaration(s) will be considered at the return of this

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
order. Any uncontested allegation in the pleading will be considered admitted.
11
12

6.

The parties are reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a

13

magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. Accordingly, the parties shall, no later than

14

August 20, 2013, file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2)

15

a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States

16

District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and declination forms are available at the

17
18
19
20

Clerk’s Office and may also be obtained from the court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
7.

The Initial Case Management Conference, initially set for July 19, 2013, is vacated.

Dated: June 25, 2013

21
22

HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

C13-01234 HRL Order will be electronically mailed to:

2

Michael G. Pitman [e-mail]

3

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

4
5
6
7
8
9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3