Allphin v. Peter K. Fitness, LLP et al

Filing 41

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 37 Request to Dismiss Without Prejudice Defendant Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen).(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 SONDRA J. ALLPHIN, Plaintiff, v. PETER K FITNESS, LLC; PETER T. KOFITSAS; FULCO FULFILLMENT, INC.; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 PETER K. FITNESS, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Third-Party Plaintiff, v. IDEAL JACOBS CORPORATION, IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN) CORPORATION, ANDREW CONRAD JACOBS, XIAMEN IDEAL JACOBS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, IDEAL JACOBS XIAMEN CORPORATION, IDEAL JACOBS MALAYSIA CORPORATION Third-Party Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 13-CV-01338-LHK ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 13-CV-01338 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN) 1 On March 25, 2013, Third-Party Plaintiff Peter K. Fitness, Inc. (“Peter K. Fitness”) filed a 2 Third-Party Complaint, naming as Defendants Ideal Jacobs Corporation, and Ideal Jacobs 3 (Xiamen) Corporation (“Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen)”). ECF No. 4. 4 On May 28, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a request for entry of default against Ideal Jacobs 5 (Xiamen). ECF No. 24. Default was entered as to Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) on May 29, 2013. ECF 6 No. 25. 7 On June 5, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation to file an Amended Third-Party Complaint, 8 naming the original two Defendants and several others, as reflected in the caption of this action. 9 ECF No. 27. The Court granted the stipulation on June 7, 2013. ECF No. 31. Third-Party United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendant Andrew Conrad Jacobs filed an Answer to the Amended Third-Party Complaint on June 11 27, 2013, alleging in relevant part that Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) was dissolved on or about July 26, 12 2011. ECF No. 36, at 2. 13 On July 1, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a request to vacate the May 29, 2013 Default entered 14 against Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen), and to dismiss Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen), “a dissolved New Jersey 15 Corporation,” from this action without prejudice. ECF No. 37. Accordingly, the Court vacated the 16 May 29, 2013 Default entered against Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen). ECF No. 39. 17 However, on July 2, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a new Amended Third-Party Complaint, 18 again naming Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) as a Defendant. ECF No. 38. On July 8, 2013, the Court 19 requested clarification from Peter K. Fitness as to whether the July 2, 2013 filing constitutes a 20 Second Amended Complaint, and whether Peter K. Fitness continues to seek the dismissal without 21 prejudice of Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen). ECF No. 39. 22 On July 10, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a response to the Court’s request for clarification, 23 confirming that it continues to seek the dismissal without prejudice of Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen), a 24 dissolved New Jersey corporation. ECF No. 40 (“Response to Request for Clarification”). The 25 Court hereby GRANTS this request, and dismisses Peter K. Fitness from this action, without 26 prejudice. 27 Peter K. Fitness’s Response to the Request for Clarification also explained that the new 28 Amended Third-Party Complaint filed on July 2, 2013, was an edited version of the Amended 2 Case No.: 13-CV-01338 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN) 1 Third-Party Complaint which the Court granted leave to file on June 7, 2013, pursuant to 2 stipulation of the parties. ECF No. 31. Peter K. Fitness represents to the Court that these 3 additional edits were made “with the consent of the parties.” However, the Court has not granted 4 leave to file a further amended complaint. If Peter K. Fitness wishes to file a Complaint other than 5 the one the Court granted leave to file on June 7, 2013, Peter K. Fitness shall file a motion to file a 6 Second Amended Complaint. If all parties consent to this further amendment, the parties shall file 7 a stipulation to that effect. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Dated: July 15, 2013 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No.: 13-CV-01338 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?