Allphin v. Peter K. Fitness, LLP et al
Filing
41
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 37 Request to Dismiss Without Prejudice Defendant Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen).(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
SONDRA J. ALLPHIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
PETER K FITNESS, LLC; PETER T.
KOFITSAS; FULCO FULFILLMENT, INC.;
and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
15
Defendants.
16
17
PETER K. FITNESS, LLC, a New Jersey
Limited Liability Company,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
IDEAL JACOBS CORPORATION, IDEAL
JACOBS (XIAMEN) CORPORATION,
ANDREW CONRAD JACOBS, XIAMEN
IDEAL JACOBS INTERNATIONAL
LIMITED, IDEAL JACOBS XIAMEN
CORPORATION, IDEAL JACOBS
MALAYSIA CORPORATION
Third-Party Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 13-CV-01338-LHK
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL
JACOBS (XIAMEN)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 13-CV-01338
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN)
1
On March 25, 2013, Third-Party Plaintiff Peter K. Fitness, Inc. (“Peter K. Fitness”) filed a
2
Third-Party Complaint, naming as Defendants Ideal Jacobs Corporation, and Ideal Jacobs
3
(Xiamen) Corporation (“Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen)”). ECF No. 4.
4
On May 28, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a request for entry of default against Ideal Jacobs
5
(Xiamen). ECF No. 24. Default was entered as to Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) on May 29, 2013. ECF
6
No. 25.
7
On June 5, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation to file an Amended Third-Party Complaint,
8
naming the original two Defendants and several others, as reflected in the caption of this action.
9
ECF No. 27. The Court granted the stipulation on June 7, 2013. ECF No. 31. Third-Party
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Defendant Andrew Conrad Jacobs filed an Answer to the Amended Third-Party Complaint on June
11
27, 2013, alleging in relevant part that Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) was dissolved on or about July 26,
12
2011. ECF No. 36, at 2.
13
On July 1, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a request to vacate the May 29, 2013 Default entered
14
against Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen), and to dismiss Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen), “a dissolved New Jersey
15
Corporation,” from this action without prejudice. ECF No. 37. Accordingly, the Court vacated the
16
May 29, 2013 Default entered against Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen). ECF No. 39.
17
However, on July 2, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a new Amended Third-Party Complaint,
18
again naming Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) as a Defendant. ECF No. 38. On July 8, 2013, the Court
19
requested clarification from Peter K. Fitness as to whether the July 2, 2013 filing constitutes a
20
Second Amended Complaint, and whether Peter K. Fitness continues to seek the dismissal without
21
prejudice of Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen). ECF No. 39.
22
On July 10, 2013, Peter K. Fitness filed a response to the Court’s request for clarification,
23
confirming that it continues to seek the dismissal without prejudice of Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen), a
24
dissolved New Jersey corporation. ECF No. 40 (“Response to Request for Clarification”). The
25
Court hereby GRANTS this request, and dismisses Peter K. Fitness from this action, without
26
prejudice.
27
Peter K. Fitness’s Response to the Request for Clarification also explained that the new
28
Amended Third-Party Complaint filed on July 2, 2013, was an edited version of the Amended
2
Case No.: 13-CV-01338
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN)
1
Third-Party Complaint which the Court granted leave to file on June 7, 2013, pursuant to
2
stipulation of the parties. ECF No. 31. Peter K. Fitness represents to the Court that these
3
additional edits were made “with the consent of the parties.” However, the Court has not granted
4
leave to file a further amended complaint. If Peter K. Fitness wishes to file a Complaint other than
5
the one the Court granted leave to file on June 7, 2013, Peter K. Fitness shall file a motion to file a
6
Second Amended Complaint. If all parties consent to this further amendment, the parties shall file
7
a stipulation to that effect.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
Dated: July 15, 2013
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 13-CV-01338
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DISMISS DEFENDANT IDEAL JACOBS (XIAMEN)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?