Brooks v. Cate

Filing 6

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/15/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BRUCE BROOKS, 13 14 15 16 Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 13-1352 LHK (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 17 On March 26, 2013, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a federal writ of 18 habeas corpus. That same day, the Court sent a notification to Petitioner, informing him that he 19 did not pay the filing fee, nor did he file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis 20 (“IFP”). The Court provided Petitioner with a blank IFP application, along with a return 21 envelope, and a notification that the case would be dismissed if Petitioner failed to pay the fee, 22 or file a completed application with supporting documentation within thirty days. On May 8, 23 2013, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to proceed IFP. On May 29, 2013, the Court denied 24 Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed IFP and issued an order to Respondent to show cause 25 why the petition should not be granted. In the order, the Court directed Petitioner to pay the 26 $5.00 filing fee within thirty days, or face dismissal. 27 To date, Petitioner has not paid the filing fee. As more than thirty days have passed since 28 Order of Dismissal G:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Brooks352disifp.wpd 1 Petitioner was instructed to do so, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall 2 terminate all pending motions. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 7/15/13 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal G:\PRO-SE\LHK\HC.13\Brooks352disifp.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?