Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER 14 for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/28/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2014)
1
2
3
Tom Weathered #115207
999 16th Street, #7.
San Francisco, CA 94107
Tel. (415) 865-0399
tweathered4@gmail.com
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dorothy Cantu
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOROTHY CANTU
12
Plaintiff,
NO. 13- 1621 RMW
13
vs.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
14
CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner,
TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
15
Social Security Administration
JUDGMENT
16
Defendant
17
Plaintiff Dorothy Cantu requests an extension of time to file her Motion for Summary
18
Judgment until March 31 2014. This is Plaintiff’s first equest for an extension.
Good cause for the extension exists because Plaintiff’s new attorney has just entered his
19
20
appearance as attorney for Ms. Cantu and must become fulkly familiar with the record and
21
prepare the Motion for Summary Judgment under Local Rule 16-5. No previous Motion to
22
Extend Time has been filed in this action.
23
All deadlines for Defendant should likewise be extended, with Defendant’s Cross Motion for
24
Summary Judgment due on April 28, 2014.
25
DATE: 3/11/2014
26
27
/s/
Tom Weathered
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dorothy Cantu
28
Motion for Extension of Time
Order
Page 1
1
Dated:
By:
Patrick Snyder
Special Assistant United States
Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
2
3
4
5
6
Of Counsel:
April Alongi
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
7
ORDER
8
Having considered the Motion the Court finds that it should be GRANTED. It is
9
therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until March 31, 2014 to file her Motion for
10
Summary Judgment in this case.
11
Date:
12
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Motion for Extension of Time
Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?