Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER 14 for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/28/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Tom Weathered #115207 999 16th Street, #7. San Francisco, CA 94107 Tel. (415) 865-0399 tweathered4@gmail.com 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Dorothy Cantu 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOROTHY CANTU 12 Plaintiff, NO. 13- 1621 RMW 13 vs. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 14 CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY 15 Social Security Administration JUDGMENT 16 Defendant 17 Plaintiff Dorothy Cantu requests an extension of time to file her Motion for Summary 18 Judgment until March 31 2014. This is Plaintiff’s first equest for an extension. Good cause for the extension exists because Plaintiff’s new attorney has just entered his 19 20 appearance as attorney for Ms. Cantu and must become fulkly familiar with the record and 21 prepare the Motion for Summary Judgment under Local Rule 16-5. No previous Motion to 22 Extend Time has been filed in this action. 23 All deadlines for Defendant should likewise be extended, with Defendant’s Cross Motion for 24 Summary Judgment due on April 28, 2014. 25 DATE: 3/11/2014 26 27 /s/ Tom Weathered Attorney for Plaintiff Dorothy Cantu 28 Motion for Extension of Time Order Page 1 1 Dated: By: Patrick Snyder Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 Of Counsel: April Alongi Assistant Regional Counsel Social Security Administration 7 ORDER 8 Having considered the Motion the Court finds that it should be GRANTED. It is 9 therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until March 31, 2014 to file her Motion for 10 Summary Judgment in this case. 11 Date: 12 United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Motion for Extension of Time Order Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?