Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER 17 for an Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and/or to File any Cross-Motions. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/18/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, ISBN 6191786
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
PATRICK WILLIAM SNYDER, CSBN 260690
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12

DOROTHY CANTU,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

17
18
19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 13-1621-RMW
STIPULATION AND
ORDER FOR EXTENSION TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR TO
FILE ANY CROSS-MOTIONS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Dorothy Cantu (Plaintiff) and

20

Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of

21

record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of thirty-nine (39) days to respond to Plaintiff’s

22

Motion For Summary Judgment and/or to file any cross-motions thereto. This is the first extension of

23

time requested by Defendant. The defense attorney assigned to this matter, Sharon Lahey, did not

24

calendar or receive electronic notice for this matter due to an inadvertent office assignment error. Ms.

25

Lahey requests this additional time to properly assess the issues that Plaintiff raises in her brief. Ms.

26

Lahey requests this extension after the current deadline because she was not aware of this issue at the

27

time Defendant’s response was originally due. The current due date was April 28, 2014. The new due

28
1
STIPULATION

CIVIL NO. 13-1621-RMW

1
2

date will be June 6, 2014. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be
modified accordingly.

3
4

Date: June 3, 2014

LAW OFFICE OF TOM WEATHERED

5
By:
6
7
8

Date: June 3, 2014

MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

9
10

By:

11
12
13
14

/s/ Tom F. Weathered
Tom F. Weathered
Attorney for the Plaintiff
(As authorized on June 3, 2014)

/s/ Patrick W. Snyder
PATRICK W. SNYDER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL TO DEFENDANT:
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

15
16

SHARON LAHEY
Assistant Regional Counsel

17

ORDER

18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DEFENDANT SHALL RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR FILE ANY CROSS-MOTIONS
THERETO ON OR BEFORE JUNE 6, 2014. PLAINTIFF SHALLY FILE ANY REPLY THERETO
ON OR BEFORE JUNE 20, 2014.

21
22
23

Dated:________________________

24

_________________________________
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION

CIVIL NO. 13-1621-RMW