San Francisco Baykeeper v. Premier Recycle Company

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Statement due by 9/3/2013. Case Management Conference continued to 9/10/2013 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. Related deadlines adjusted accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on August 13, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)

*E-FILED: August 13, 2013*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Jayni Foley Hein (Bar No. 258261)
Andrea Kopecky (Bar No. 276366)
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
785 Market Street, Suite 850
San Francisco, California 94103
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
BAYKEEPER

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13
14

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit
corporation,

15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.
PREMIER RECYCLE COMPANY,
Defendant.

Civil No. C 13-01695 HRL
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
ASSOCIATED DEADLINES; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); L.R. 16-10
Honorable Howard R. Lloyd

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONFERENCE

Civil No. C 13-01695-HRL

1
2
3
4
5
6

Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”) and Defendant Premier Recycle Company
(“Premier Recycle”) in the above-captioned action respectfully submit this stipulation as follows:
WHEREAS, Baykeeper and Premier Recycle (collectively, the “Parties”) have been working
together in good faith to reach a settlement in this action;
WHEREAS, the Parties have already exchanged and are currently finalizing the terms of what
they anticipate will be a final Consent Decree for approval by the court;

7

WHEREAS, the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR

8

Deadlines (“Scheduling Order”) set the initial Case Management Conference in this matter for July 23,

9

2013 at 1:30 pm;

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

WHEREAS, per a previous Stipulation and Order of the Court, the Initial Case Management
Conference was continued until August 20, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.;
WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order states that if the Initial Case Management Conference is
continued, the other deadlines are continued accordingly;
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue negotiating settlement in good faith and anticipate
reaching a final settlement in this action within the next four (4) weeks;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to September 10, 2013 at 1:30 pm,
or as soon thereafter as the Court is available.
2. The Parties’ ADR certifications and stipulations to ADR process or notices of need for

20

an ADR phone conference shall be due two weeks before the Case Management

21

Conference.

22
23
24
25
26

3. The Parties’ Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement shall be due one
week before the Case Management Conference.
4. The Parties shall make initial disclosures or state objections in their Rule 26(f) Report no
later than one week before the Case Management Conference.
Dated: August 1, 2013

27
28
29
30
31

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONFERNCE

Civil No. C 13-01695 HRL

Respectfully submitted,

1
2

By:
/s/ Andrea Kopecky
Andrea Kopecky
Attorney for Plaintiff
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER

3
4
5
6
7
8

By:
/s/ Anna Le May
Anna Le May
Attorney for Defendant
PREMIER RECYCLE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONFERNCE

Civil No. C 13-01695 HRL

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

September 10, 2013
1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to___________________ at 1:30
pm. Related deadlines are adjusted accordingly.
2. The ADR certifications and stipulations to ADR process or notices of need for an ADR
phone conference shall be filed no later than ______________.
3. The Parties’ Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no
later than ________________.
4. The Parties shall make initial disclosures or state objections in their Rule 26(f) Report no
later than _____________________.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

August 13, 2013
Date: ______________

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18

____________________________________
Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
United States District Court

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT CONFERENCE

Civil No. C 13-01695-HRL