IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. v. Voxernet LLC

Filing 133

ORDER by Judge Howard Lloyd granting 99 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 106 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 IPVX PATENT HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 5:13-cv-01708 HRL Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEAL v. 14 15 VOXERNET LLC., [Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 106] Defendant. 16 17 18 Before the court are two administrative motions to seal papers relating to Voxernet’s 19 motion for summary judgment of noninfringement. Dkt. Nos. 99, 106. Having reviewed the 20 parties’ submissions and accompanying declarations as required by Civil Local Rule 79-5, the 21 court grants the motions to seal. The sealed information contains confidential business information 22 related to Voxernet’s business. The court therefore seals: 23 • Dkt. No. 99-3: Exhibit A to the Declaration Deepal S. Chadha in Support of 24 IPVX’s Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non- 25 Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction (Voxer “Developing the Business” 26 presentation). 27 28 1 • Dkt. No. 99-4: Exhibit B to the Declaration Deepal S. Chadha in Support of 2 IPVX’s Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non- 3 Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction (Voxer Total Userbase). 4 • Dkt. No. 99-5: Exhibit L to the Declaration Deepal S. Chadha in Support of IPVX’s 5 Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non- 6 Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction (RebelVox Product Requirements 7 Document). 8 • Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction 9 referring to the sealed exhibits. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Dkt. No. 99-6: Portions of IPVX’s Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For • Dkt. No. 106-6: Portions of Supplemental Declaration of James T. Panttaja in 12 Support of Voxernet LLC’s Reply in Support of LLC’s Motion For Summary 13 Judgment Of Non-Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction. 14 • Dkt. No. 106-4: Portions of Voxernet LLC’s Reply in Support of LLC’s Motion 15 For Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction 16 referring to sealed portions of Panttaja’s supplemental declaration. 17 18 SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: July 3, 2014 20 21 ______________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?