IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. v. Voxernet LLC
Filing
133
ORDER by Judge Howard Lloyd granting 99 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 106 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
IPVX PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.,
Case No. 5:13-cv-01708 HRL
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
SEAL
v.
14
15
VOXERNET LLC.,
[Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 106]
Defendant.
16
17
18
Before the court are two administrative motions to seal papers relating to Voxernet’s
19
motion for summary judgment of noninfringement. Dkt. Nos. 99, 106. Having reviewed the
20
parties’ submissions and accompanying declarations as required by Civil Local Rule 79-5, the
21
court grants the motions to seal. The sealed information contains confidential business information
22
related to Voxernet’s business. The court therefore seals:
23
•
Dkt. No. 99-3: Exhibit A to the Declaration Deepal S. Chadha in Support of
24
IPVX’s Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non-
25
Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction (Voxer “Developing the Business”
26
presentation).
27
28
1
•
Dkt. No. 99-4: Exhibit B to the Declaration Deepal S. Chadha in Support of
2
IPVX’s Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non-
3
Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction (Voxer Total Userbase).
4
•
Dkt. No. 99-5: Exhibit L to the Declaration Deepal S. Chadha in Support of IPVX’s
5
Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For Summary Judgment Of Non-
6
Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction (RebelVox Product Requirements
7
Document).
8
•
Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction
9
referring to the sealed exhibits.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Dkt. No. 99-6: Portions of IPVX’s Opposition To VoxerNet, LLC’s Motion For
•
Dkt. No. 106-6: Portions of Supplemental Declaration of James T. Panttaja in
12
Support of Voxernet LLC’s Reply in Support of LLC’s Motion For Summary
13
Judgment Of Non-Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction.
14
•
Dkt. No. 106-4: Portions of Voxernet LLC’s Reply in Support of LLC’s Motion
15
For Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Reliant Upon Claim Construction
16
referring to sealed portions of Panttaja’s supplemental declaration.
17
18
SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: July 3, 2014
20
21
______________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?