Adaptix, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al

Filing 146

ORDER RE: NOTICE OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO COMPEL (171 in 5:13-cv-01777-PSG) Notice (Other) filed by Apple, Inc., (145 in 5:13-cv-01774-PSG) Notice (Other) filed by Cellco Partnership, (162 in 5:13-cv-01844-PSG) Notice (Other) filed b y Cellco Partnership, (144 in 5:13-cv-01774-PSG) Stipulation filed by Adaptix, Inc., (170 in 5:13-cv-01777-PSG) Stipulation filed by Adaptix, Inc., (175 in 5:13-cv-01776-PSG) Stipulation filed by Adaptix, Inc., (161 in 5:13-cv-01844-PSG) Stipulation filed by Adaptix, Inc., (152 in 5:13-cv-02023-PSG) Stipulation filed by Adaptix, Inc., (153 in 5:13-cv-02023-PSG) Notice (Other) filed by Apple, Inc.. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 26, 2014. (psglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN JOSE DIVISION

4
5

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,

6
7

v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, et al.,

8

Defendants.

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
ADAPTIX, INC.,
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.
Defendants.

18
19

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,

20
v.
21
22

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a
VERIZON WIRELESS, et al.,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:13-cv-01774-PSG

Case No. 5:13-cv-01776-PSG

Case No. 5:13-cv-01777-PSG

Case No. 5:13-cv-01844-PSG

Case No. 5:13-cv-02023-PSG

28
1
Case Nos. 5:13-cv-1774; -1776; -1777;-1844; -2023
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO COMPEL

1
2

The court has received word that Friday's hearing on the parties' various discovery disputes is

3

no longer required. As the court understands it, since the initial hearing request, the parties have

4

met on multiple occasions and hammered out a deal.

5
6

Based on this understanding, Friday's hearing is cancelled. In plenty of other cases, this
court has highlighted and criticized weak attempts to meet-and-confer on discovery, especially in

7
patent cases, the failure of which leave messes for the court to clean up. In this instance, however,
8
9

counsel have done precisely the opposite. It is a safe bet that no party got everything it wanted, or

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

even most of it. But such compromise speaks to good faith efforts on both sides. For that, the

11

court wishes to say thanks

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

Dated: March 26, 2014
_____________________________________

15
16

PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case Nos. 5:13-cv-1774; -1776; -1777;-1844; -2023
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO COMPEL