Adaptix, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al

Filing 167

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying (178) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (180) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 5:13-cv-01777-PSG; denying (147) Administrative Motion to File Under Se al; denying (149) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 5:13-cv-01774-PSG; denying (180) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 5:13-cv-01778-PSG; denying (178) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (180) Administ rative Motion to File Under Seal in case 5:13-cv-01776-PSG; denying (165) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (166) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 5:13-cv-01844-PSG; denying (161) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (163) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 5:13-cv-02023-PSG (psglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN JOSE DIVISION

4
5
6
7
8
9

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a
VERIZON WIRELESS, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16
17
18

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.
Defendants.

19
20

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,

21
22

v.
AT&T, Inc., et al.,

23
24

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:13-cv-01774-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 147, 149)

Case No. 5:13-cv-01776-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 178, 180)

Case No. 5:13-cv-01777-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 178, 180)

Case No. 5:13-cv-01778-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO SEAL
(Re: Docket No. 180)

25
26
27
28
1
Case Nos. 5:13-cv-1774; -1776; -1777; -1778; -1844; -2023
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL

1

ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,

2
3
4

v.
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a
VERIZON WIRELESS, et al.,
Defendants.

5
6

ADAPTIX, INC.,

7
8
9

Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC., et al.
Defendants.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 5:13-cv-01844-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 165, 166)

Case No. 5:13-cv-02023-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
(Re: Docket Nos. 161, 163)

11
12

Defendants have submitted multiple motions to seal documents connected with the recent

13

discovery letter briefing because they contain information that Adaptix may consider confidential.

14

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Adaptix is required to submit a declaration within four days of

15

the setting forth the reasons that any confidential information should remain sealed. No such

16

declarations were filed in the instant motions. Therefore, the motions are DENIED.

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
Dated: April 17, 2014
19
20
21

_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case Nos. 5:13-cv-1774; -1776; -1777; -1778; -1844; -2023
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL