Sung v. Bussio et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER 20 Requesting Changing Briefing Schedule Time and Setting Motion Hearing. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 14 MOTION to Dismiss for (1) Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; (2) Improper Venue; and (3) Failure to State Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. Motion Hearing set for 8/30/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/22/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

GRENVILLE PRIDHAM (CA SBN 120695)
2230 West Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92868
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
MARK T. LAVERY
THE LAVERY LAW FIRM
180 N. LaSalle, Suite 3700
Chicago, IL 60601
admitted pro hac vice
Counsel for Plaintiff
[e-mail]
[phone]

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

ARLEEN SUNG,

14

Case No.: C 13-1786
Judge Ronald M. Whyte

Plaintiff,

15
v.
16
17
18
19
20

ANGELA BUSSIO, NOVUS NORTH LLC
dba YES INTERNATIONAL, PHILLIP
EDWARD GANNUSCIA, RICHARD
SCOTT NEMROW, JEFFREY NICOL,
JESSICA BJARNSON, SKYLER BOYD
JARMAN, and JOHN DOES 1-100,

STIPULATION REQUESTING AND
ORDER CHANGING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE TIME

Defendants

21
22
23
24
25

STIPULATION REQUESTING AN ORDER
CHANGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE TIME
The parties hereby stipulate in accordance with N.D. Cal. Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 and
request that the Court enlarge the time for filing briefs -- including the response in opposition to

26

Defendants’ Rule 12 Motion and the Defendants’ Reply in support of Defendants’ Rule 12

27

Motion -- due to the fact that Defendants filed a 40 page memorandum in support and due to

28

intervening summer family vacations of Plaintiff’s Counsel. Defendant’s previously received an
Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and Order to Change Briefing Schedule
Sung v. Bussio, Yes International

1

enlargement of time to file their Rule 12 Motion. The requested modification of time has no

2

effect on the schedule for the case. The parties request as follows:

3
4

Plaintiff may file a response brief up until August 2, 2013 and Defendants may file a
reply brief up until August 16, 2013.

5
6

Respectfully Submitted,

7
8

Dated: July 18, 2013.

/s/ Grenville Pridham
Grenville Pridham
2230 West Chapman Avenue
Orange, Ca. 92868
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Arleen Sung

Dated: July 18, 2013.

/s/ Richard J. Armstrong
Richard J. Armstrong
Counsel for Defendants

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER

17
18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

19

Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants’ pending Rule 12 Motion up until

20

August 2, 2013 and Defendants may file a reply brief in support of their motion up until

21

August 16, 2013.

22
23

Dated:

2013.

24
25

District Judge Ronald M. Whyte

26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Stipulation and Order to Change Briefing Schedule
Sung v. Bussio, Yes International