Abrams v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al

Filing 95

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/2/2015. Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila.In addition, after considering th e parties' arguments in the Joint Case Management Conference Statement, disclosure and discovery are stayed until further order of the court. This court finds that the pending Motion for Reconsideration is akin to a Motion to Dismiss that warrants a stay on discovery. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/17/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 IN RE INTUITIVE SURGICAL SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 5:13-CV-01920-EJD 9 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed on 15 November 14, 2014 (Docket Item No. 94), the court finds that a scheduling conference is 16 premature at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference scheduled for November 17 21, 2014 is CONTINUED to 10:00 a.m. on January 8, 2015. The parties shall file an updated 18 Joint Case Management Conference Statement (of no more than 10 pages) on or before January 19 2, 2015. 20 In addition, after considering the parties’ arguments in the Joint Case Management 21 Conference Statement, disclosure and discovery are stayed until further order of the court. This 22 court finds that the pending Motion for Reconsideration is akin to a Motion to Dismiss that 23 warrants a stay on discovery per the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 24 78u-4(b)(3)(B). See Petrie v. Elec. Game Card, Inc., 761 F.3d 959, 968 (9th Cir. 2014) (“no 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:13-CV-01920-EJD ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?