Abrams v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al
Filing
95
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/2/2015. Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila.In addition, after considering th e parties' arguments in the Joint Case Management Conference Statement, disclosure and discovery are stayed until further order of the court. This court finds that the pending Motion for Reconsideration is akin to a Motion to Dismiss that warrants a stay on discovery. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/17/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
IN RE INTUITIVE SURGICAL
SECURITIES LITIGATION
Case No. 5:13-CV-01920-EJD
9
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed on
15
November 14, 2014 (Docket Item No. 94), the court finds that a scheduling conference is
16
premature at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference scheduled for November
17
21, 2014 is CONTINUED to 10:00 a.m. on January 8, 2015. The parties shall file an updated
18
Joint Case Management Conference Statement (of no more than 10 pages) on or before January
19
2, 2015.
20
In addition, after considering the parties’ arguments in the Joint Case Management
21
Conference Statement, disclosure and discovery are stayed until further order of the court. This
22
court finds that the pending Motion for Reconsideration is akin to a Motion to Dismiss that
23
warrants a stay on discovery per the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §
24
78u-4(b)(3)(B). See Petrie v. Elec. Game Card, Inc., 761 F.3d 959, 968 (9th Cir. 2014) (“no
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:13-CV-01920-EJD
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?