Radware, LTD. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc.

Filing 198

ORDER for Briefing Regarding Motion for Relief from Magistrate's Order Granting Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/30/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16

RADWARE, LTD.; RADWARE, INC.,
Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants,
v.

Case Nos. C-13-02021
ORDER FOR BRIEFING RE MOTION
FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE’S
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

A10 NETWORKS, INC.,
Defendant, Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

17
18
19

Defendants A10 Networks, Inc. (“A10”) moves for relief from the magistrate’s order

20

granting plaintiffs Radware, Inc. and Radware Ltd. (collectively “Radware”) leave to amend their

21

infringement contentions. Dkt. No. 184. In its motion, A10 accuses Radware of making

22

“egregiously false and misleading arguments in its reply” that the magistrate ultimately replied upon

23

in his order. Id. at 1. The court orders Radware to file a responsive brief of no more than 5 pages no

24

later than 5 p.m. on May 7, 2014 addressing A10’s accusations that Radware misrepresented the

25

facts to the magistrate in its reply brief. The brief should be supported by a declaration testifying to

26

facts showing that Radware’s specific representations to the magistrate judge were true.

27
28
ORDER FOR BRIEFING
Case Nos. C-13-2021-RMW
RDS

-1-

1
2

Dated: April 30, 2014

_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER FOR BRIEFING
Case Nos. C-13-2021-RMW
RDS

-2-