Radware, LTD. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc.

Filing 239

ORDER to meet and confer re 215 , 216 . Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on 6/27/2014. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

SAN JOSE DIVISION

8
9
10
11
12
13

RADWARE LTD., an Israeli Company;
RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey
Corporation,

Case No. C-13-2021 RMW
(Related Case No. C-13-02024-RMW)
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER RE:
“NOTION OF NARROWED SCOPE FOR
JOINT DISCOVERY DISPUTE REPORT
NO. 3” AND “MOTION TO STRIKE”
SAME

Plaintiffs,
v.
A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
Corporation,

[Re: Dkt. Nos. 215, 216]

14
15

Defendant.

16
17
The court has reviewed Radware’s “Notice of Narrowed Scope for Joint Discovery Report
18
No. 3,” Dkt. No. 215, and A10’s “Motion to Strike” the same, Dkt. No. 216. The court also
19
reviewed the parties numerous other filings relating to this dispute. See Dkt. Nos. 150, 154, 188,
20
190, 194, 210, 212, 214, 220, 221, 221 and 243.
21
It appears that the only disputes between the parties are (1) production of Mr. Mao’s
22
documents and (2) whether A10 must produce documents from “all network, central and personal
23
repositories” that 12 custodians had access to. Dkt. No. 215. It does not appear that the parties
24
have met and conferred regarding these disputes. Because this discovery dispute should be
25
capable of resolution without the court’s intervention, the parties are ordered to meet and confer
26
pursuant to Judge Lloyd’s Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes and file a joint report as
27
detailed in Judge Lloyd’s Order. The joint report must be filed by 5p.m. on July 16, 2014.
28
ORDER RE: MEET AND CONFER
CASE NO. C-13-2021-RMW

-1-

1
2

Dated: June 27, 2014
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE: MEET AND CONFER
CASE NO. C-13-2021-RMW

-2-