Radware, LTD. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc.

Filing 269

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE PROPOSED REDACTIONS. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/23/2015. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RADWARE, LTD., et al., Case No. 13-cv-02021-RMW Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE A PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF COURT'S ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS v. 9 10 A10 NETWORKS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 268 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On January 23, 2015 the court filed an order denying plaintiff Radware’s motion to 13 dismiss. See Dkt. No. 268. The court’s order was filed under seal, and will remain under seal for 5 14 days. Should the parties file within 5 days a joint proposed redacted version of the court’s order, 15 the court’s order will remain sealed and the court will enter the redacted version on the public 16 docket. The court suggests that the parties meet and confer to coordinate the filing of such a joint 17 proposed redacted version of the court’s order. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 23, 2015 ______________________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13-cv-02021-RMW EDB 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?