Radware, LTD. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc.
Filing
269
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE PROPOSED REDACTIONS. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/23/2015. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RADWARE, LTD., et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-02021-RMW
Plaintiffs,
8
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO
FILE A PROPOSED REDACTED
VERSION OF COURT'S ORDER
DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
9
10
A10 NETWORKS, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 268
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On January 23, 2015 the court filed an order denying plaintiff Radware’s motion to
13
dismiss. See Dkt. No. 268. The court’s order was filed under seal, and will remain under seal for 5
14
days. Should the parties file within 5 days a joint proposed redacted version of the court’s order,
15
the court’s order will remain sealed and the court will enter the redacted version on the public
16
docket. The court suggests that the parties meet and confer to coordinate the filing of such a joint
17
proposed redacted version of the court’s order.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 23, 2015
______________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13-cv-02021-RMW
EDB
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?