Radware, LTD. et al v. F5 Networks, Inc.

Filing 45

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 41 to Extend Time to Respond to Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/27/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
MENLO PAR K

11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

TERRENCE P. MCMAHON (SBN 71910)
[e-mail]
FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825)
[e-mail]
JUDITH S.H. HOM (SBN 203482)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (SBN 259906)
[e-mail]
BARRINGTON DYER (SBN 264762)
[e-mail]
TERI H.P. NGUYEN (SBN 267498)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650 815 7400
Facsimile:
650 815 7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants
RADWARE, LTD. AND RADWARE, INC.

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

SAN JOSE DIVISION
RADWARE, LTD., an Israeli company;
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-02024 RMW
RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey
(Related Case No. 5:13-cv-02021 RMW)
corporation,
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
Plaintiffs,
TIME TO RESPOND TO
v.
COUNTERCLAIMS
F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington
corporation,
Defendant.
F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington
corporation,
Defendant.
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,

22
23
24

v.
RADWARE, LTD., an Israeli company;
RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey
corporation,
Counterclaim-Defendants.

Complaint Filed: May 1, 2013
Complaint Served: May 3, 2013
Complaint Answered: July 25, 2013
F5 Amended Answer with Counterclaims:
August 29, 2013
Current Radware Response to
Counterclaims: September 19, 2013
New Radware Response to Counterclaims:
October 21, 2013

25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties,

2

pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, that the time for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Radware Ltd. and

3

Radware, Inc. (hereinafter “Radware”) to answer, move or otherwise respond to the

4

Counterclaims in F5 Networks, Inc.’s First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, has been

5

extended through and including October 21, 2013, subject to the approval of this Court in

6

consideration of the following facts:

7
8

1. WHEREAS, F5 Networks, Inc. (hereinafter “F5”) was served with Radware’s
complaint on May 3, 2013;

9

2. WHEREAS, F5 answered Radware’s complaint on July 25, 2013;
3. WHEREAS, F5 filed an Amended Answer with Counterclaims on August 29, 2013;

11

4. WHEREAS, F5 has agreed to provide Radware an extension of time until October 21,

12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

2013 to respond to Counterclaims;

13
14
15
16
17

5. WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for the purpose of unnecessarily delaying this
action;
6. WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed on September 4, 2013, within which
Radware is to file its Response to F5’s counterclaims;
NOW, THEREFORE, Radware and F5, by and through their respective counsel of record,

18

hereby stipulate and agree that Radware shall have an extension up to and including October 19,

19

2013 to answer, move or otherwise respond to F5’s counterclaims.

20

SO STIPULATED this 4th day of September, 2013.

21
22
23

Dated: September 4, 2013

Respectfully submitted,
PERKINS COIE LLP

24
25

By:/s/ Christopher Kao
Christopher Kao

26

Attorneys for Defendant
F5 NETWORKS, INC.

27
28
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

1

Dated: September 4, 2013

2

Respectfully submitted,
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

3
4

By:/s/ Fabio E Marino
Fabio E. Marino

5

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RADWARE, LTD. AND RADWARE,
INC.

6
7
8
9

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

11
12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

I, Fabio E. Marino, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that the

Dated: September 4, 2013
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

13
14
15

By:/s/ Fabio E Marino
Fabio E. Marino
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RADWARE, LTD. AND RADWARE,
INC.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
MENLO PAR K

11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

TERRENCE P. MCMAHON (SBN 71910)
[e-mail]
FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825)
[e-mail]
JUDITH S.H. HOM (SBN 203482)
[e-mail]
NITIN GAMBHIR (SBN 259906)
[e-mail]
BARRINGTON DYER (SBN 264762)
[e-mail]
TERI H.P. NGUYEN (SBN 267498)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone:
650 815 7400
Facsimile:
650 815 7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants
RADWARE, LTD. AND RADWARE, INC.

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

SAN JOSE DIVISION
RADWARE, LTD., an Israeli company;
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-02024 RMW
RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey
(Related Case No. 5:13-cv-02021 RMW)
corporation,
[] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiffs,
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
v.
TIME TO RESPOND TO
COUNTERCLAIMS
F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington
corporation,
Complaint Filed: May 1, 2013
Defendant.
Complaint Served: May 3, 2013
Complaint Answered: July 25, 2013
F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington
corporation,
F5 Amended Answer with Counterclaims:
August 29, 2013
Defendant.
Current Radware Response to
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
Counterclaims: September 19, 2013
v.
New Radware Response to Counterclaims:
RADWARE, LTD., an Israeli company;
October 21, 2013
RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey
corporation,
Counterclaim-Defendants.

25
26
27
28
[] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

1

Having considered the stipulation between the parties, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, that the

2

time for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Radware Ltd. and Radware, Inc. (hereinafter

3

“Radware”) to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Counterclaims in F5 Networks, Inc.’s

4

First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, has been extended through and including October 21,

5

2013, the Court GRANTS the following:

6
7

1. WHEREAS, F5 Networks, Inc. (hereinafter “F5”) was served with Radware’s
complaint on May 3, 2013;

8

2. WHEREAS, F5 answered Radware’s complaint on July 25, 2013;

9

3. WHEREAS, F5 filed an Amended Answer with Counterclaims on August 29, 2013;

11

4. WHEREAS, F5 has agreed to provide Radware an extension of time until October 21,
2013 to respond to Counterclaims;

12
MENLO PAR K

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

13
14
15
16

5. WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for the purpose of unnecessarily delaying this
action;
6. WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed on September 4, 2013, within which
Radware is to file its Response to F5’s counterclaims;
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

DATED: ____________

________________________________________
THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW