Chunghwa Telecom Global, Inc v. Medcom, LLC et al
Filing
21
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/18/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)
1
2
*E-FILED: June 18, 2013*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
CHUNGHWA TELECOM GLOBAL, INC., a
California corporation,
12
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. C13-02104 HRL
v.
MEDCOM, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability
Company; QT TALK, INC., a Nevada
Corporation; DAVID COOPER, an individual;
CHRIS SANDERS, an individual, and Does 150, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
/
18
19
On June 7, 2013, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local
20
Rule 73-1, all parties were required to file, no later than June 14, 2013, either (1) a Consent to
21
Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a
22
Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Despite
23
reminders from the court, not all parties have done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT
24
the Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to a District Judge. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636; Civ.
25
L.R. 73-1.
26
Dated: June 18, 2013
27
HOWARD R. LLOYD
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:13-cv-02104-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Helen Lee Greenberg greenberg@lbbslaw.com, auwbrey@lbbslaw.com,
johnsony@lbbslaw.com, vincent@lbbslaw.com
3
Michael Fishman
MFishman@mflawny.com
4
Michael Steven Romeo
romeo@lbbslaw.com
5
Nelson Hsieh
nhsieh@gpsllp.com, ccalone@gpsllp.com
Yen Phi Chau
ychau@gpsllp.com, mbender@gpsllp.com
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?