Sanchez v. Peacock Cupertino, Inc et al

Filing 16

ORDER amending 14 Order Dismissing Case (correcting the case number in the Order) (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 E-FILED on 10/8/2013 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 NAHUM HERNANDEZ SANCHEZ, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 v. PEACOCK CUPERTINO, INC.; JAY AND RAM; RAMCHANDER GOPALSWAMY; and VEERAVENKATA DURGAPRASAD VASIREDDY, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER REVOKING REMAND ORDER AND DISMISSING CASE [Re: Dkt. Nos. 12-13] Defendants. 18 19 No. C-13-02107 RMW On September 27, 2013 the parties filed a joint stipulation to remand this case to the Superior Court of California. This action was never filed in the Superior Court of California, and accordingly cannot be remanded. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). For these reasons, the court revokes the remand order at Dkt. No. 12 and hereby dismisses the case for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 8, 2013 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 27 28 ORDER REVOKING REMAND ORDER AND DISMISSING CASE—No. C-13-02107 RMW ALG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?