MacGregor v. Martin et al
Filing
41
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/16/2015 for Defendant Martin. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/12/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
KEVIN A. MACGREGOR,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
DR. MARTIN, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 13-2309 RMW (PR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint against prison
19
officials at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court ordered
20
service of plaintiff’s civil rights complaint upon defendants. (Docket No. 7.) The court received
21
a letter from SQSP Litigation Coordinator indicating that Dr. Timothy Martin was a former
22
employee of SQSP. A confidential current address was provided. (Docket No. 26.) On
23
September 24, 2014, the court ordered that a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of
24
Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of plaintiff’s
25
complaint and all attachments thereto, and a copy of the court’s order be mailed to Dr. Timothy
26
Martin at the confidential address provided by the SQSP Litigation Coordinator. (Docket No.
27
29.) The court’s order directed defendant Martin to file a motion for summary judgment by
28
within sixty days. (Id. at 2.) On October 6, 2014, defendant Timothy B. Martin, D.O. returned a
Order to Show Cause
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.13\MacGregor309osc-Martin.wpd
1
signed waiver of service of summons. (Docket No. 32.) Rather than file a motion for summary
2
judgment, answer, or motion for an extension of time, defendant Martin has not further
3
communicated with the court.
4
Accordingly, defendant Martin ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why an entry of default
5
should not be made against him. Defendant Martin must file a written response to this Order to
6
Show Cause within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this order. Failure to file a timely
7
written response may be deemed an admission that no good cause exists for defendant’s failure
8
to follow the court’s September 24, 2014 order, and an entry of default may issue without further
9
proceedings.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order to Show Cause
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.13\MacGregor309osc-Martin.wpd 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KEVIN ANTHONY MACGREGOR,
Case Number: CV13-02309 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
DR. MARTIN, et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on February 12, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Kevin A. MacGregor V-94008
Bldg #A-5,240
High Desert State Prison
PO Box 3030
Susanville, CA 96127
Dated: February 12, 2015
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?