Andrade v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Filing
6
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FROM THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: pursuant to 28 USC 1407, transferring case "Andrade v. Bayer HealthCare Pham1aceuticals, Inc." from the Northern District of California (13-cv-02417) to the Southern District of New York to become part of MDL 2434. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2434
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL
TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -8)
On April 8, 2013, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 62 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to
Judge Seibel.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi district
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U .S.C. §1407 to the
Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Jun 20, 2013
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Jeffery N. Luthi
Clerk of the Panel
A CERTIFIED COPY
RUBY J. KRAJIC CLERK
Case MN/0:13-cv-01364 Document 3 Filed 06/20113 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2434
SCHEDULE CT0-8- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
13-02417
Iniguez et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
et al
Andrade v. Bayer HealthCare Pham1aceuticals, Inc.
3
13-00795
Petry et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc
6
13-01213
Rogers v. Bayer Corporation et al
CAN
3
CAN
5
13-02459
CONNECTICUT
CT
KANSAS
KS
LOUISIANA EASTERN
LAE
2
13-04725
Mejia v. Bayer HealthCare, LLC et al
MINNESOTA
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
0
0
0
0
0
0
13-01291
13-01357
13-01358
13-01362
13-01364
13-01365
Ryan v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Carter
v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Lichtenwaldt
v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Rutherford v.
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pasierb v.
Bayer Healthcare Pham1aceuticals, Inc.
Elms v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN
NCE
4
13-00121
Letters v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
WISCONSIN EASTERN
WIE
2
13-00530
Barnes v. Bayer Corporation et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?