Andrade v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Filing 6

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FROM THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: pursuant to 28 USC 1407, transferring case "Andrade v. Bayer HealthCare Pham1aceuticals, Inc." from the Northern District of California (13-cv-02417) to the Southern District of New York to become part of MDL 2434. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)

Download PDF
          UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION       IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2434       (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -8) On April 8, 2013, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 62 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.   It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to Judge Seibel.   Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi district Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U .S.C. §1407 to the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.   This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.       FOR THE PANEL:             Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted.   Jun 20, 2013   CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Jeffery N. Luthi Clerk of the Panel             A CERTIFIED COPY RUBY J. KRAJIC CLERK   Case MN/0:13-cv-01364 Document 3 Filed 06/20113 Page 2 of 2               IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2434       SCHEDULE CT0-8- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS       C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION     CALIFORNIA NORTHERN       13-02417 Iniguez et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Andrade v. Bayer HealthCare Pham1aceuticals, Inc. 3 13-00795 Petry et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc 6 13-01213 Rogers v. Bayer Corporation et al CAN 3 CAN 5 13-02459       CONNECTICUT   CT   KANSAS   KS   LOUISIANA EASTERN   LAE 2 13-04725 Mejia v. Bayer HealthCare, LLC et al     MINNESOTA   MN MN MN MN MN MN 0 0 0 0 0 0 13-01291 13-01357 13-01358 13-01362 13-01364 13-01365       Ryan v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Carter v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Lichtenwaldt v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Rutherford v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pasierb v. Bayer Healthcare Pham1aceuticals, Inc. Elms v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.   NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN NCE 4 13-00121 Letters v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. WISCONSIN EASTERN   WIE 2 13-00530 Barnes v. Bayer Corporation et al

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?