Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Filing
190
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 181 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 182 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 183 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 184 Motion to Amend/Correct (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
12
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A.,
INC., AND TAKEDA
PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
TWI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 13-CV-02420-LHK
ORDER GRANTING RENEWED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
SEAL
18
Before the Court are the parties’ renewed administrative sealing motions (ECF Nos. 181,
19
182, 183), which were filed in connection with TWi’s summary judgment motion. According to
20
the standards set forth in Kamakana v City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.
21
2006), In re Electronic Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008), and Apple, Inc. v.
22
Samsung Electronics. Co., 727 F.3d 1214, 1228-29 (Fed. Cir. 2013), the Court reviews the parties’
23
sealing motions under the “compelling reasons” standard.
24
With this standard in mind, the Court rules as follows:
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 13-CV-02420-LHK
ORDER GRANTING RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL
1
2
3
Motion to Seal
ECF No.
181
181-3
181
181-5
181
181-7
181
181-9
8
182
182-3
9
183
183-3
10
183
183-5
11
183
183-8
183
183-11
183
183-14
4
5
6
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
7
12
13
14
15
16
Document to be Sealed
TWi’s Motion for Summary
Judgment
Mizerk Decl. Ex HH: Deposition
of Dr. William N. Charman
Mizerk Decl. Ex NN: Expert
Report of Dr. William N.
Charman on Infringement
Mizerk Decl. Ex ZZ: Rebuttal
Expert Report of Dr. Edmund J.
Elder, Jr., on Non-Infringement
Reply in Support of TWi’s
Motion for Summary Judgment
Takeda’s Opposition to TWi’s
Motion for Summary Judgment
Takahashi Decl. Ex. 3: Expert
Report of Dr. Brian Fennerty
Takahashi Decl. Ex. 49: Expert
Report of Dr. William N.
Charman
Takahashi Decl. Ex. 50: Reply
Expert Report of Dr. William N.
Charman
Takahashi Decl. Ex. 54:
Declaration of Dr. William N.
Charman
Ruling
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
GRANTED as to proposed
redactions.
The Court also GRANTS Takeda’s motion to file a corrected public redacted version of its
17
Opposition to TWi’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 184.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: May 5, 2015
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 13-CV-02420-LHK
ORDER GRANTING RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?