Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 72 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending the Deadline to Respond to Second Amended Complaint filed by FireEye Inc. Response due 11/21/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/30/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Michael J. Bettinger (SBN 122196)
[e-mail]
Shane Brun (SBN 179079)
[e-mail]
Holly Hogan (SBN 238714)
[e-mail]
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
FIREEYE, INC.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

John M. Neukom (SBN 275887)
[e-mail]
Andrew M. Holmes (SBN 260475)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FORTINET, INC.

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN JOSE DIVISION

20

FORTINET, INC.,

Case No. 5:13-cv-02496-EJD-PSG
Plaintiff,

22

Complaint Filed: August 22, 2012
Trial Date: None

vs.

23

XXXXXXXXXX
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendant.

21

FIREEYE, INC.,

24
25
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT; Case No. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG

1

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2014, the Court issued an order granting-in-part and denying-

2

in-part Defendant FireEye, Inc.’s (“FireEye”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.’s (“Fortinet”)

3

First Amended Complaint, and also granting Fortinet leave to file a second amended complaint, Dkt.

4

No. 70;

5

WHEREAS, on October 15, 2014, Fortinet filed a Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 71;

6

WHEREAS, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(a)(3), FireEye’s response to

7
8
9
10
11

Fortinet’s Second Amended Complaint would be due on October 29, 2014;
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend FireEye’s time to respond to Fortinet’s Second
Amended Complaint until November 21, 2014;
AND WHEREAS extending FireEye’s time to respond to November 21, 2014 will not affect
any other deadline currently scheduled in this matter;

12

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to and request an extension of the deadline for FireEye to

13

file its response to Fortinet’s Second Amended Complaint from October 29, 2014 to and including

14

Friday, November 21, 2014.

15
16
17

Dated: October 28, 2014

Respectfully submitted,
K&L GATES LLP

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By:
/s/ Shane Brun
MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (SBN 122196)
SHANE BRUN (SBN 179079)
HOLLY HOGAN (SBN 238714)
K&L GATES LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94111-5994
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.882.8220
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
FIREEYE, INC.

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT; Case No. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG

1

Dated: October 28, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

2
By:
/s/ John Neukom
John M. Neukom (SBN 275887)
Andrew M. Holmes (SBN 260475)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff
FORTINET, INC.

10
11
12

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

13

Pursuant to General Order 45X.B, I, Shane Brun, attest that the above signatories have

14

concurred and consented to the filing of this document.

15
Dated: October 28, 2014
16

/s/ Shane Brun______________
Shane Brun

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT; Case No. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG

1
2
3
4

ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation, this Court GRANTS the parties’ request to extend FireEye’s
deadline to respond to Fortinet’s Second Amended Complaint to November 21, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

10/30/2014
DATED: _______________________________

________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT; Case No. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG