Clear-View Technologies, Inc., v. Rasnick et al

Filing 208

ORDER STRIKING Parties' Proposed Preliminary Statements and Verdict Forms. The parties are ORDERED to file joint versions of these documents which comply with the Court's Standing Order no later than 5 p.m. Wednesday, May 27, 2015. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/26/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 CLEAR-VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,, Case No. 13-cv-02744-BLF Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 JOHN H. RASNICK, et al., Defendants. 10 ORDER STRIKING PARTIES’ SEPARATE PRETRIAL DOCUMENTS; FURTHER ORDERING JOINT DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED BY 5 P.M. WEDNESDAY, MAY 27, 2015 [Re: ECF 205, 206] United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The above-captioned case is scheduled for a pretrial conference on May 28, 2015 at 2:30 13 p.m. Pursuant to the undersigned’s Standing Order Re Final Pretrial Conference, the parties in this 14 action were required, no later than May 21, 2015, to provide the Court with a joint preliminary 15 statement and a joint proposed verdict form. See Standing Order at 5-6. 16 The parties have failed to comply with the Court’s Standing Order. The parties provided 17 the Court with separate preliminary statements and separate verdict forms, both of which were 18 filed late. See ECF 205 (separate proposed verdict forms), ECF 206 (separate preliminary 19 statements). Further, the length and complexity of Defendants’ proposed verdict, at 135 pages, is 20 unreasonable. 21 The Court hereby STRIKES the parties’ proposed preliminary statements and verdict 22 forms. The parties are ORDERED to submit JOINT versions of these two documents, which fully 23 comply with the Court’s Standing Order, no later than 5 p.m. on Wednesday, May 27, 2015. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2015 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?