Quintin v. Unknown

Filing 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/19/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALDINE QUINTIN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 15 UNKNOWN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 13-2909 LHK (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 16 17 On June 24, 2013, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a letter which commenced this 18 action. The same day, the clerk notified plaintiff that she had not paid the filing fee, nor had she 19 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The clerk also notified plaintiff that 20 she failed to submit a complaint. Along with the deficiency notices, plaintiff was provided with 21 a new IFP application and instructions for completing it. Plaintiff was further cautioned that her 22 failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay the filing fee within twenty-eight days 23 would result in the dismissal of this action. In addition, plaintiff was advised that her failure to 24 file a complaint within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this action. To date, 25 plaintiff has not paid her filing fee, filed a completed IFP application, or filed a complaint. 26 Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall enter 27 judgment and close the file. The clerk is also directed to send an electronic copy of plaintiff’s 28 original letter (docket no. 1), and a copy of this order to the courtroom deputy of Judge Thelton Order of Dismissal G:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.13\Quintin909disifpcomp.wpd 1 2 3 Henderson. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 8/19/13 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal G:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.13\Quintin909disifpcomp.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?