J2 Global, Inc. v. Integrated Global Concepts, Inc.

Filing 38

ORDER 37 Continuing Mediation Session. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/17/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146) sacksr@sullcrom.com 2 Brian R. England (SBN 211335) englandb@sullcrom.com 3 Edward E. Johnson (SBN 241065) johnsonee@sullcrom.com 4 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 2100 5 Los Angeles, California 90067-1725 Tel.: (310) 712-6600 6 Fax: (310) 712-8800 7 Frank L. Bernstein (SBN 189504) fbernstein@kenyon.com 8 KENYON & KENYON LLP 1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210 9 Palo Alto, California 94304-1216 Tel.: (650) 384-4700 10 Fax: (650) 384-4701 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff j2 Global, Inc. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 J2 GLOBAL, INC., 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP ) ) ) ) ) v. ) ) INTEGRATED GLOBAL ) CONCEPTS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________ ) ) INTEGRATED GLOBAL ) CONCEPTS, INC., ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) v. ) ) J2 GLOBAL, INC., ) ) Counterclaim-Defendant. ) ) Case No. CV 13-02971 RMW [] ORDER CONTINUING MEDIATION SESSION [] ORDER 1 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation Continuing 2 Mediation Session. The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation, finds 3 good cause in support thereof. 4 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 5 The Stipulation is GRANTED. The deadline to conduct the mediation 6 session in this action is continued to March 31, 2014 without prejudice to 7 requesting that the Court consider a further stipulation should the parties deem a 8 further extension beneficial for the prospects of settlement. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: ________________________________ 13 The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP [] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?