Miller v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al

Filing 31

ORDER ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION re 30 Statement of Recent Decision filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Since this district's Civil Local Rules do not provide for the filing of Statements of Recent Decision after a motion's noticed hearing date, the parties to this action shall not file any further Statements of Recent Decision with regard to the currently pending Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/17/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-03192 EJD

ROBERT MILLER,

11

ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF RECENT
DECISION

Plaintiff(s),
v.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., et. al.,
13
14

Defendant(s).
/

15
Since this district’s Civil Local Rules do not provide for the filing of Statements of Recent
16

Decision after a motion’s noticed hearing date,1 the parties to this action shall not file any further

17
Statements of Recent Decision with regard to the currently pending Motion to Dismiss.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: April 17, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
1

27
28

“Before the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court’s attention a relevant
judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply was filed by filing and serving a
Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and providing a copy of the new
opinion–without argument.” Civ. L. R. 7-3(d)(2).
1
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-03192 EJD
ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT DECISION