Finisar Corporation v. Nistica, Inc.

Filing 171

ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 3/27/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FINISAR CORPORATION,

Case No. 13-cv-03345-BLF (JSC)

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY
HEARING

9
10

NISTICA, INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 155

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Plaintiff Finisar Corporation (“Finisar”) brings this patent infringement lawsuit against its

14

competitor, Defendant Nistica, Inc. (“Nistica”), alleging infringement of six of Finisar’s patents

15

directed at devices and components used in optical communications networks. This matter has

16

been referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for the purposes of discovery. (Dkt. No. 58.)

17

Now pending before the Court is Finisar’s motion to strike portions of Nistica’s amended

18

preliminary invalidity contentions. (Dkt. No. 155.) The parties appeared in court for a hearing on

19

that motion on March 26, 2015. Having considered the parties’ filing, and in light of the parties’

20

representations at that hearing, it is ORDERED that, if necessary, the parties shall file by close of

21

business on Monday, March 30, 2015, a stipulation and proposed briefing schedule on cross-

22

motions for leave to amend infringement and invalidity contentions.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 27, 2015

25
26
27
28

________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge