Finisar Corporation v. Nistica, Inc.

Filing 199

UNSEALING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/21/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

FINISAR CORPORATION,

Case No. 13-cv-03345-BLF (JSC)

Plaintiff,
7
v.

UNSEALING ORDER

8
9

NISTICA, INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 181

Defendant.
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On April 6, 2015, the Court granted in part Finisar’s motion to strike Nistica’s amended

13

invalidity contentions without prejudice to allowing Nistica to file a formal motion seeking to

14

establish good cause to amend. (Dkt. No. 181 at 15.) The Court filed the April 6 Order under seal

15

because various matters referenced therein were filed under seal in this matter. (Id. at 17.)

16

However, the Court noted that it was “not persuaded that any of the things discussed in th[e] Order

17

are in fact confidential and properly sealable” and required the parties to inform the Court by no

18

later than April 10 what information, if any, within the Order must remain sealed. (Id. at 17-18.)

19

The Court advised the parties that “[f]ailure to file such a statement will result in unsealing of th[e]

20

Order in its entirety.” (Id.) The parties have failed to inform the Court what information needs to

21

remain sealed, and the deadline to do so has long since passed. The Court notes that its Order

22

contains no details of or references to the content of documents filed under seal. Accordingly, the

23

Court orders that its April 6 Order be UNSEALED.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 21, 2015

26
27
28

________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge