Finisar Corporation v. Nistica, Inc.

Filing 254

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING IN CONNECTION WITH APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/7/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 FINISAR CORPORATION, Case No. 13-cv-03345-BLF Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 NISTICA, INC., ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING IN CONNECTION WITH APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 The Court has indicated its intent to appoint Robert B. Morrill as special master to oversee 15 summary judgment in this case, subject to his filing of an affidavit under 28 U.S.C. § 455. The 16 parties are hereby directed to begin meeting and conferring regarding a schedule for summary 17 judgment including deadlines for: 18 (1) briefing before the special master; 19 (2) a hearing (if any) before the special master; 20 (3) timeline for the special master’s report and recommendation; 21 (4) briefing for the parties’ response to the special master’s report; and 22 (5) a hearing (if any) before the Court regarding the special master’s report. 23 The parties shall provide a stipulated proposed schedule to the Court by no later than August 21, 24 2015. Upon receipt of the proposed schedule, the Court will determine whether the present trial 25 date remains viable. 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 The parties are requested not to have ex parte communications with the special master except for scheduling and administrative matters. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2015 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?