Finisar Corporation v. Nistica, Inc.
Filing
345
ORDER REGARDING 344 REDACTION OF ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF EXPERT REPORTS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/1/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
FINISAR CORPORATION,
Case No. 13-cv-03345-BLF
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
NISTICA, INC.,
ORDER REGARDING REDACTION OF
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
STRIKE PORTIONS OF EXPERT
REPORTS
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
[Re: ECF 344]
The Court has filed its order on the parties’ motions to strike portions of expert reports
13
under seal because it contains information that the Court previously allowed to be filed under seal
14
due to their highly confidential and business sensitive nature. See e.g., ECF 337. This order will
15
be separately transmitted to the parties in this case. The order filed under seal contains highlighted
16
portions that are potentially sealable under the Court’s past sealing orders. The parties are ordered
17
to meet and confer and by no later than December 8, 2015 and submit proposed redactions to the
18
Court’s order (to the extent any further redaction is required), as well as a supporting declaration
19
and proposed order. The parties are also encouraged to inform the Court if any portion that is
20
already highlighted does not need to be redacted and are reminded that redactions are to be
21
narrowly tailored. If no proposed redactions are received by 11:59 p.m. on December 8, 2015, the
22
Court shall unseal the order in its entirety.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: December 1, 2015
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?