Doe 1 et al v. Successfulmatch.com

Filing 59

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 7, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiffs, v. SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, a California Corporation, Defendant. 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The Court continues the October 8, 2014 case management conference to January 21, 2015 at 2 p.m. 20 In light of the parties’ stipulation accepting the Court’s proposed schedule, ECF No. 58, the Court sets the following amended case schedule: 21 THIRD MOTION TO DISMISS: 22 23 Motion: November 4, 2014 Opposition: November 18, 2014 Reply: November 25, 2014 Hearing: December 18, 2014 24 25 26 CLASS CERTIFICATION Motion: March 18, 2015. Briefing must be completed by April 16, 2015. Hearing: May 7, 2015 27 FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: July 23, 2015 28 EXPERT DISCOVERY: Opening Reports: August 6, 2015 1 Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Rebuttal Reports: August 20, 2015 Close of Expert Discovery: September 3, 2015 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by September 17, 2015, and set for hearing no later than October 22, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are limited to one dispositive motion per side in the entire case. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: December 17, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. JURY/COURT TRIAL: January 25, 2016 at 9 a.m. Trial is expected to last 5 days. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: October 7, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHK CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?