Doe 1 et al v. Successfulmatch.com
Filing
59
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 7, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
v.
SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, a California
Corporation,
Defendant.
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
The Court continues the October 8, 2014 case management conference to January 21, 2015
at 2 p.m.
20
In light of the parties’ stipulation accepting the Court’s proposed schedule, ECF No. 58, the
Court sets the following amended case schedule:
21
THIRD MOTION TO DISMISS:
22
23
Motion: November 4, 2014
Opposition: November 18, 2014
Reply: November 25, 2014
Hearing: December 18, 2014
24
25
26
CLASS CERTIFICATION
Motion: March 18, 2015. Briefing must be completed by April 16, 2015.
Hearing: May 7, 2015
27
FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: July 23, 2015
28
EXPERT DISCOVERY:
Opening Reports: August 6, 2015
1
Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
Rebuttal Reports: August 20, 2015
Close of Expert Discovery: September 3, 2015
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by September 17, 2015, and set for hearing no later than
October 22, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are limited to one dispositive motion per side in
the entire case.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: December 17, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.
JURY/COURT TRIAL: January 25, 2016 at 9 a.m. Trial is expected to last 5 days.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: October 7, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHK
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?