Steshenko v. Gayrard et al

Filing 56

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 30 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion to Compel. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO,

Case No. 5:13-cv-03400 LHK (HRL)

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Plaintiff,
12

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION TO COMPEL

v.
13
14

SUZANNE GAYRARD, et al.,

[Re: Dkt. 30]

Defendants.
15
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a motion to compel disclosure of the names and

16
17

locations of certain defendants is denied. The court has “stay[ed] discovery until any of Plaintiff’s

18

claims survive a motion to dismiss.” (Dkt. 36). The docket indicates that defendants’ first motion

19

to dismiss was granted and that they have a pending motion to dismiss the first amended

20

complaint. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiff to seek the information he wants in

21

discovery and through proper discovery tools, if any of his claims proceed beyond the pleading

22

stage.

23

Dated: September 16, 2014

24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1
2
3
4
5
6

5:13-cv-03400-LHK Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Gregory Nicholas Steshenko

[e-mail], [e-mail]

Jeffrey Richard Vincent [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]
Rohit Kodical [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2