Premium Valley Produce, Inc., et al v. Hayes Produce Marketing, L.P. et al
Filing
23
ORDER extending temporary restraining order and resetting hearing on preliminary injunction to August 26, 2013. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
PREMIUM VALLEY PRODUCE, INC.,
a corporation; C & G FARMS, INC., a
corporation; and MANN PACKING CO.,
INC., a corporation,
17
18
19
20
21
EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiffs,
15
16
Case No. C-13-03658
vs.
[Re Docket No. 22]
HAYES PRODUCE MARKETING, LP, a
limited partnership; HAYES PRODUCE
MARKETING, LLC, a limited liability
company; and TIMOTHY J. HAYES, an
individual,
Defendants.
22
23
Plaintiffs move for an extension of the temporary restraining order, because,
24
despite their diligent efforts, they have been unable to serve the defendant. Finding good
25
cause, the court orders as follows:
26
1. The hearing on plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction currently
27
scheduled for August 19, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. shall be taken off calendar and
28
continued approximately 7 days to August 26, 2013, at 9 a.m. before the
1
1
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, United Stated District Judge in Courtroom 6, 4th
2
Floor;
3
2. The temporary restraining order, Dkt. No. 19, will remain in effect until the
4
hearing on August 26, 2013;
5
2. The following deadlines are set:
6
o August 19, 2013 deadline to personally serve defendants;
7
o August 21, 2013 deadline for defendants to file and personally serve
8
plaintiffs’ counsel an opposition to the Order to Show Cause, if any, and;
9
o August 23, 2013 deadline for plaintiffs to file and serve a reply to
10
defendants’ opposition, if any.
11
12
13
DATED: August 16, 2013
14
Ronald M. Whyte
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?