Premium Valley Produce, Inc., et al v. Hayes Produce Marketing, L.P. et al

Filing 27

ORDER extending TRO and preliminary injunction hearing until September 5, 2013. Signed by Judge Whyte on 8/27/13. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013) Modified on 8/27/2013 (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 PREMIUM VALLEY PRODUCE, INC., a corporation; C & G FARMS, INC., a corporation; and MANN PACKING CO., INC., a corporation, 17 18 19 20 vs. [Re Docket No. 26] HAYES PRODUCE MARKETING, LP, a limited partnership; HAYES PRODUCE MARKETING, LLC, a limited liability company; and TIMOTHY J. HAYES, an individual, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 16 CASE NO. 5:13-cv-03658-RMW Defendants. Plaintiffs move for an extension of the temporary restraining order, because, despite their diligent efforts, they have been unable to serve the defendant. Finding good cause, the court orders as follows: 1. The hearing on plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be held September 5 1:30 p on ____________________, 2013 at _____ __.m. before the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, United States District Judge in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor; 28 1 1 2. 2 3 4 5 6 The temporary restraining order, Docket No. 19, will remain in effect until the hearing on ____________________, 2013; September 5 3. The following deadlines are set: September 3  ___________________ deadline to serve defendants (2 days prior to the hearing) __________________  September 5, 10 am deadline for defendants to file and 7 personally serve plaintiffs’ counsel an opposition to the Order to 8 Show Cause, at or before the hearing on the Order to Show Cause 9 10 SO ORDERED. 11 12 DATED: 8/27/2013 13 HON. RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?