Premium Valley Produce, Inc., et al v. Hayes Produce Marketing, L.P. et al
Filing
27
ORDER extending TRO and preliminary injunction hearing until September 5, 2013. Signed by Judge Whyte on 8/27/13. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013) Modified on 8/27/2013 (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
PREMIUM VALLEY PRODUCE, INC.,
a corporation; C & G FARMS, INC., a
corporation; and MANN PACKING CO.,
INC., a corporation,
17
18
19
20
vs.
[Re Docket No. 26]
HAYES PRODUCE MARKETING, LP, a
limited partnership; HAYES PRODUCE
MARKETING, LLC, a limited liability
company; and TIMOTHY J. HAYES, an
individual,
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiffs,
15
16
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-03658-RMW
Defendants.
Plaintiffs move for an extension of the temporary restraining order, because,
despite their diligent efforts, they have been unable to serve the defendant. Finding good
cause, the court orders as follows:
1.
The hearing on plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be held
September 5
1:30 p
on ____________________, 2013 at _____ __.m. before the Honorable
Ronald M. Whyte, United States District Judge in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor;
28
1
1
2.
2
3
4
5
6
The temporary restraining order, Docket No. 19, will remain in effect until
the hearing on ____________________, 2013;
September 5
3.
The following deadlines are set:
September 3
___________________ deadline to serve defendants (2 days prior to
the hearing)
__________________
September 5, 10 am deadline for defendants to file and
7
personally serve plaintiffs’ counsel an opposition to the Order to
8
Show Cause, at or before the hearing on the Order to Show Cause
9
10
SO ORDERED.
11
12
DATED: 8/27/2013
13
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?