Nguyen et al v. CTS Electronic Manufacturing Solutions, Inc.,
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 1/20/2014. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
TUNG VAN NGUYEN & THANG LE,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
CTS ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING
SOLUTIONS INC., AND DOES 1 THROUGH )
)
25, INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 13-CV-03679-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
In its January 6, 2014 Order, the Court held that “should Plaintiffs each elect to file a
23
Second Amended Complaint, they shall do so within 21 days of the date of this Order. . . .
24
Plaintiffs’ failure to meet the 21-day deadline to file their separate amended complaints or failure
25
to cure the deficiencies identified in this Order will result in a dismissal with prejudice.” ECF No.
26
23. Plaintiffs have filed to file amended complaints in the timeline set forth by the Court. Thus, this
27
case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The clerk shall close the case file.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Case No.: 13-CV-03679-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
1
Dated: January 29, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 13-CV-03679-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?