Nguyen et al v. CTS Electronic Manufacturing Solutions, Inc.,

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 1/20/2014. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) TUNG VAN NGUYEN & THANG LE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) CTS ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS INC., AND DOES 1 THROUGH ) ) 25, INCLUSIVE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) Case No.: 13-CV-03679-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE In its January 6, 2014 Order, the Court held that “should Plaintiffs each elect to file a 23 Second Amended Complaint, they shall do so within 21 days of the date of this Order. . . . 24 Plaintiffs’ failure to meet the 21-day deadline to file their separate amended complaints or failure 25 to cure the deficiencies identified in this Order will result in a dismissal with prejudice.” ECF No. 26 23. Plaintiffs have filed to file amended complaints in the timeline set forth by the Court. Thus, this 27 case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The clerk shall close the case file. 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Case No.: 13-CV-03679-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 1 Dated: January 29, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 13-CV-03679-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?