Mitac Digital Corporation v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting Stipulation. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/25/2014. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)

Download PDF
Case5:13-cv-03704-BLF Document38 Filed08/20/14 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 PAUL E. RICE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Paul E. Rice (State Bar No. 062509) 350 Cambridge Avenue, Suite 225 Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: 650-289-9088 Facsimile: 650-289-9093 price@civlit.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant MiTAC Digital Corporation 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 350 Cambridge Ave., Suite 225 Palo Alto, CA 94306 (650) 289-9088 PAUL E. RICE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 11 MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, INC., Defendant. 16 17 Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD., Honorable Beth Labson Freeman 18 Counter-claimant, 19 v. 20 21 MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION, INC.; MAGELLAN NAVIGATION, INC.,; and ROES 1-50, inclusive, 22 Counter-defendants. 23 24 WHEREAS Plaintiff MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION has provided to Defendant HON 25 HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD. a proposed Second Amended Complaint a copy of which 26 sans lengthy exhibits is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 27 28 WHEREAS HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD has reviewed said proposed 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF Case5:13-cv-03704-BLF Document38 Filed08/20/14 Page2 of 3 1 Second Amended Complaint. 2 2015, subject to Court order, and to a rescheduling by approximately 90 to 120 days of all attending 5 dates currently set, for reasons including the necessity of taking numerous depositions in Taiwan, 6 including non-party depositions, as well as other depositions outside of California and the 7 complexities and delays involved in such, particularly as to non-party depositions in Taiwan, as well 8 as the desire of HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD to conduct discovery related to 9 additional facts and claims set forth in the proposed Second Amended Complaint. The parties have 10 agreed to the filing of said proposed Second Amended Complaint, with Defendant to have thirty days 11 to respond thereto: which agreement is not conditioned upon the Court vacating the existing trial date 12 350 Cambridge Ave., Suite 225 Palo Alto, CA 94306 (650) 289-9088 WHEREAS the parties have agreed in principal to vacate the existing trial date of March 2, 4 PAUL E. RICE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3 and or rescheduling other dates. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Dated: August 20, 2014 PAUL E. RICE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 17 18 19 20 21 By: /s/ Paul E. Rice Paul E. Rice Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant MiTAC Digital Corporation 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF Case5:13-cv-03704-BLF Document38 Filed08/20/14 Page3 of 3 1 Dated: August 20, 2014 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 2 3 By: /s/ Ivan L. Tjoe Ivan L. Tjoe. Jeff W. Poole Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-claimant Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. 4 5 6 7 8 The above having been considered, and good cause shown: 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff may file its proposed Second Amended Complaint and 11 that Defendant shall have thirty days to respond thereto. 12 350 Cambridge Ave., Suite 225 Palo Alto, CA 94306 (650) 289-9088 PAUL E. RICE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 10 13 14 15 August 25, 2014 Dated: ______________________ _________________________________ U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?