Mitac Digital Corporation v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Inc. et al
Filing
39
ORDER granting Stipulation. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/25/2014. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)
Case5:13-cv-03704-BLF Document38 Filed08/20/14 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
PAUL E. RICE, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Paul E. Rice (State Bar No. 062509)
350 Cambridge Avenue, Suite 225
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: 650-289-9088
Facsimile: 650-289-9093
price@civlit.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant
MiTAC Digital Corporation
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
350 Cambridge Ave., Suite 225
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 289-9088
PAUL E. RICE,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
11
MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO PERMIT FILING OF
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, INC.,
Defendant.
16
17
Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO.,
LTD.,
Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
18
Counter-claimant,
19
v.
20
21
MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION, INC.;
MAGELLAN NAVIGATION, INC.,; and
ROES 1-50, inclusive,
22
Counter-defendants.
23
24
WHEREAS Plaintiff MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION has provided to Defendant HON
25
HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD. a proposed Second Amended Complaint a copy of which
26
sans lengthy exhibits is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
27
28
WHEREAS HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD has reviewed said proposed
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF
Case5:13-cv-03704-BLF Document38 Filed08/20/14 Page2 of 3
1
Second Amended Complaint.
2
2015, subject to Court order, and to a rescheduling by approximately 90 to 120 days of all attending
5
dates currently set, for reasons including the necessity of taking numerous depositions in Taiwan,
6
including non-party depositions, as well as other depositions outside of California and the
7
complexities and delays involved in such, particularly as to non-party depositions in Taiwan, as well
8
as the desire of HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD to conduct discovery related to
9
additional facts and claims set forth in the proposed Second Amended Complaint. The parties have
10
agreed to the filing of said proposed Second Amended Complaint, with Defendant to have thirty days
11
to respond thereto: which agreement is not conditioned upon the Court vacating the existing trial date
12
350 Cambridge Ave., Suite 225
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 289-9088
WHEREAS the parties have agreed in principal to vacate the existing trial date of March 2,
4
PAUL E. RICE,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
3
and or rescheduling other dates.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Dated: August 20, 2014
PAUL E. RICE,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
17
18
19
20
21
By: /s/ Paul E. Rice
Paul E. Rice
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant
MiTAC Digital Corporation
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF
Case5:13-cv-03704-BLF Document38 Filed08/20/14 Page3 of 3
1
Dated: August 20, 2014
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
2
3
By: /s/ Ivan L. Tjoe
Ivan L. Tjoe.
Jeff W. Poole
Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-claimant
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
4
5
6
7
8
The above having been considered, and good cause shown:
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff may file its proposed Second Amended Complaint and
11
that Defendant shall have thirty days to respond thereto.
12
350 Cambridge Ave., Suite 225
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 289-9088
PAUL E. RICE,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
10
13
14
15
August 25, 2014
Dated: ______________________
_________________________________
U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
Case No. 13-CV-03704-BLF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?